Looks kinda off; not just here, but on their Pixiv too.
Posted under General
Looks kinda off; not just here, but on their Pixiv too.
VR-Man said:
Looks kinda off; not just here, but on their Pixiv too.
I haven't looked at all of their posts, but I hear alarms blaring. I don't think these hair flowers were created by a human; the shading on this valentine's box is weird and inconsistent; and I don't know what the hell is going on with this pearl necklace. Seems like an AI account to me.
Just noticed that the flag of post #9838465 got rejected, but the artist entry wiki says this is an AI prompter.
Jyuu said:
A dumb question but I really need know: a pixiv post with #ai is a work generated with ai? I found a really good post, but there #ai, but aiBlock from pixiv didn't hide this.
#アイ(ai) is an ambiguous tag. It can mean many things including the character's name. Use your best judgement.
Jyuu said:
A dumb question but I really need know: a pixiv post with #ai is a work generated with ai? I found a really good post, but there #ai, but aiBlock from pixiv didn't hide this.
Pretty sure that Pixiv's anti-AI option only blocks a couple of AI tags, rather than being a comprehensive tool that blocks all AI stuff.
Artist's pixiv contains AI images. While it's entirely possible that they've learned to draw, it's also equally as possible that they changed the AI's model. I am not noticing anything suspicious on their uploaded art in this site, but you never know.
Byakuren_Enjoyer said:
[...]
I think the posts under this tag are not AI-Generated. There are some drawing process posted on the artist's Bilibili account.
I uploaded post #9859120 and was tagged as ai-generated , but I saw artist's profile and I didn't see where is ai indication. If this work was ai-generated, can someone explain why?
A guy commented her eyes have a wrong color, BUT I researched and found Scheherazade works with blue eyes too. Some examples: post #3391344 , post #4930910 post #5862912
Jyuu said:
I uploaded post #9859120 and was tagged as ai-generated , but I saw artist's profile and I didn't see where is ai indication. If this work was ai-generated, can someone explain why?
This is surely an AI prompter.
I found many AI artifacts in one of this account's artworks (pixiv #133622264): Her eyes, star symbols on her bikini, melting lines on her left boot, and more.
asgembed said:
This is surely an AI prompter.
I found many AI artifacts in one of this account's artworks (pixiv #133622264): Her eyes, star symbols on her bikini, melting lines on her left boot, and more.
Hum, I see. So for now I need to look in every corner of an image to make sure it's not AI, right?
asgembed said:
Just noticed that the flag of post #9838465 got rejected, but the artist entry wiki says this is an AI prompter.
It got flagged again, but I can't tell it is AI-Generated. Any opinions?
WRS said:
I originally had this artist muted on both Twitter and Pixiv so I assume I must've thought they were AI-generated and just went on to post a few but figure I'll ask for a second look. A few of our Russian artists have that one kind of style that AI unfortunately copies or models after a lot so it can be hard to determine if it's human or not with "the style".
See later post: forum #379788.
Updated by wh665o
Looking at this and the others from their artist page, it looks more like Ixy's style.
MaskedAvenger said:
Looking at this and the others from their artist page, it looks more like Ixy's style.
I checked the account's other artworks then I think it is AI prompter. The resolution is suspicious, and there are also some obvious AI artifacts, like the stripes on sailor collar in pixiv #134311126.
wh665o said:
To follow up on this, they are posting fake 'drawing process' images via tools akin to PaintsUndo. Regardless, they missed some obvious giveaways. In the Kafka image posted on twitter, the background strings are disconnected and randomly restart at a new position after passing her body. The string 'tied' to her thigh is also not tied, just an outright AI error.
The worst giveaway is that many things (shading, proportions, outline, etc.) significantly change between the version with and without the tights, which means they either redrew the whole image (which I think is safe to rule out!) or had it passed through an AI to draw the difference.
They are trying to monetize the works, hence all this effort. This will likely catch out danbooru uploaders as this 'artist' starts noticing these signs better, so I think it would be good to put a note on their 'artist' profile.
Regarding the lines: Yes, this is the author's mistake, as she told me: “I was lazy and basically placed the lines randomly during the sketching stage.”
Proportions, shading, and contours: The problem is chromatic aberration, which was applied to different versions one by one but with different parameters (there is no standardization, everything is done manually). And yes, part of the art with the right leg (Kafka POV) was changed because the leg seemed too thick.
I am attaching link to video with the open psd file and layers:
https://x.com/1Moetsukita/status/1960769206640603212