Posted under General
ion288 said:
An other flag without a tag. Please tag or refute.
Her shorts look sus.
I don't know how but there are places where the paint doesn't cover the blue sky background. The bra straps and the hair under her right ear for example.
I would guess ai-assisted because this weirdness suggests painting over AI.
MegaFlare said:
Other works by this artist were also flagged.
Yeah, the right breast's line is not continuous under the middle bra strap, nor are the eyebrows. Eyes have weird artefacts at the borders of the irises.
ion288 said:
An other flag without a tag. Please tag or refute.
Her shorts look sus.
Placeholder1996 said:
I very nearly flagged this, but thought I should post here first. The pattern on her kimono looks extremely suspicious to me; lots of artifacts.
The prints on the kimono all look like they're drawn (and filled in) with one consistent brush size though, so I'm not sure.
The rest of this guy's arts on Pixiv look very AI-y.
VR-Man said:
The rest of this guy's arts on Pixiv look very AI-y.
A lot of them also have AI tags there; I don’t think a flag is unwarranted here. Edit: flagged.
Updated by Placeholder1996
VR-Man said:
The rest of this guy's arts on Pixiv look very AI-y.
Those crossed bangs fuse in AI-like ways and the clothes under the sidelocks look messy. Weirdly purple colored inner hair not found on the character's official design. Not the same color as hood either. Tagged it ai-generated.
What do you think about this author? It doesn’t look like AI, but I’m still not sure
Popkornikus said:
What do you think about this author? It doesn’t look like AI, but I’m still not sure
Doesn't look suspicious.
Possible AI-assisted? See comment thread for more information.
VR-Man said:
Possible AI-assisted? See comment thread for more information.
I agree with comment #2539536. And if the artist did not even bother fixing the one messed-up finger nail, it deserves to be tagged and flagged as ai-generated.
How many times was it discussed by now here that Dikko doesn't use AI?
123kid said:
How many times was it discussed by now here that Dikko doesn't use AI?
Fixed, its a slime girl. She is supposed to look, well, slimy.
Flag complains about the background but if that is all then this should be allowed.
ion288 said:
Flag complains about the background but if that is all then this should be allowed.
Not sure if the skin shading is also ai-assisted. See also pixiv #133889169's bra and skin shading.
Updated by 8253803
post #9787952
I agree with the commenter on this post that it's probably AI, but not just because the big Tachyon has six fingers on each hand. Does anyone else agree?
Blank_User said:
post #9787952
I agree with the commenter on this post that it's probably AI, but not just because the big Tachyon has six fingers on each hand. Does anyone else agree?
Seems more like badly-drawn palms to me. Will AI be almost exactly symmetrical with its hand mess-ups?
The line texture, and the coloring under the lines being visible because the lines are not fully solid, are almost impossible to be AI. AI is also unlikely to achieve this slight mismatch between the boundary of the coloring and the linework.
"AI art" is literally in the watermark, come on...
Knowledge_Seeker said:
"AI art" is literally in the watermark, come on...
They’re all flagged now
