AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

user 1342552

All of jaydamon's art looks suspicious, especially because he cites AI in the list of tools he uses in his Twitter bio.
I recently checked some of the stuff he had previously uploaded to his account and his older posts look straight up like prompts. Also his art style looks strangely similar to the style of the characters' original artists.

some his most suspicious twitter posts I've gathered so far

These images aren't on danbooru afaik (except post #9757058 ,compare it to this post ) but at some point jaydamon's style suddenly changed to look hand drawn, and some of his suspicious art created after that change made it here:
post #9757087
post #9757105
post #9757103
post #9757089
etc

What strikes me the most with him is how clean and polished the faces of the portrayed characters look compared to the rest of their body. In my humble opinion, either he traces AI-generated images, he gives them a pass of photoshop/illustrator or he just generates images with that unfinished style.

Do you people think his posts deserve to be flagged?

Reply
FrostedLeaf

elchocoloco said:

All of jaydamon's art looks suspicious, especially because he cites AI in the list of tools he uses in his Twitter bio.
I recently checked some of the stuff he had previously uploaded to his account and his older posts look straight up like prompts. Also his art style looks strangely similar to the style of the characters' original artists.

some his most suspicious twitter posts I've gathered so far

These images aren't on danbooru afaik (except post #9757058 ,compare it to this post ) but at some point jaydamon's style suddenly changed to look hand drawn, and some of his suspicious art created after that change made it here:
post #9757087
post #9757105
post #9757103
post #9757089
etc

What strikes me the most with him is how clean and polished the faces of the portrayed characters look compared to the rest of their body. In my humble opinion, either he traces AI-generated images, he gives them a pass of photoshop/illustrator or he just generates images with that unfinished style.

Do you people think his posts deserve to be flagged?

Yeah no post post #9757058 must be a prompt, i agree with you on that.
I think it's worth a shot if you can find any sure fire tells

Reply
wingdings

jaydamon has posted no less than four variations of the same Tifa Lockhart image that all look like they were generated from the same prompt. 1. 2. 3. 4.

as for the pictures themselves, many of them have prominent artifacts (see the weird bendy tree in the background of post #9757058, or the details of her outfit on post #9757069, or pretty much everything on post #9757060). as mentioned on the ai-generated wiki, 832x1216 is a common output resolution for ai, a resolution that this account exclusively uses.

Reply
thesilvercavalier

ion288 said:

post #9364735

Established artist. Bad faith flag?

I suspect their work is almost entirely ai-assisted, if not ai-generated outright. They have a history of sharing AI output and eventually deleted the most blatant work from their socials (check the deleted works for examples). The wildly variable quality of their rendering and anatomy is really suspicious, too. The time lapse clips they've shared make it hard for me to believe they're actually capable of rendering at the level of the artwork they usually share. They also have a history of hiding twitter replies that mention AI.

Reply
user 1342552

Squishy said:

post #9775471
post #9775503
post #9775537
post #9775568
post #9775593

Something about the rendering here is making me think AI-Assisted.
Varying levels of detail in some places, mostly in terms of texture

I checked their pixiv and noticed a jump in difference between their works after June and before May.

A second opinion is appreciated.

He posts his unfinished stuff on twitter ( example)

I'm no expert but I don't see any drastic change in his art. Maybe he started using different software at some point?

Reply
Squishy

elchocoloco said:

He posts his unfinished stuff on twitter ( example)

I'm no expert but I don't see any drastic change in his art. Maybe he started using different software at some point?

Right, I should have checked twitter too.
Maybe I'm getting too paranoid.

Thanks.

Reply
Diet Soda

Nmless said:

post #9806007
I feel a bit of an AI vibe, but I can’t find the original image or the artist. The reposter claims it was collected from a QQ group. I noticed that many details in the character design in post #9806007 match those in post #6670141.
So, is this image AI-generated? I really can’t tell… Please help me figure it out.

I don't see any signs of AI, all the little details that a raw AI gen would mess up are very crisp and coherent.

Reply
Nmless

Diet_Soda said:

I don't see any signs of AI, all the little details that a raw AI gen would mess up are very crisp and coherent.

Oh, I don't think so either. If it were AI, it would be too incredible. I just can't find the artist or the source, and this painting style makes me a little sensitive (a side effect of looking at too many AI images), so I wanted to confirm it. Thank you.

Reply
1 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 237