Posted under General
The artist suddenly "jumps up in skill", meaning he or she adds a ton of extremely detailed hair shadow. Hands are hidden, unlike in preceding posts (by the upload order).
(I came from a different board, one that likes to follow danbooru's judgement on such things)
mewandpewinhinur said:
The artist suddenly "jumps up in skill", meaning he or she adds a ton of extremely detailed hair shadow. Hands are hidden, unlike in preceding posts (by the upload order).
(I came from a different board, one that likes to follow danbooru's judgement on such things)
No, there’s too much detail for me to reasonably believe this is AI-generated, especially in the eyes and eyelashes. If this was machine-created, I’d expect those lines to be screwed up somehow, and they’re not. This is almost certainly human imo.
mewandpewinhinur said:
The artist suddenly "jumps up in skill", meaning he or she adds a ton of extremely detailed hair shadow. Hands are hidden, unlike in preceding posts (by the upload order).
(I came from a different board, one that likes to follow danbooru's judgement on such things)
I don't think there's a jump in skill. Taking a longer time to render a piece more elaborately does not mean they have abruptly become better. The artist is using the same set of brushes in post #9793356 as, say, post #9083370, and shading the same way. There is continuity in their work.
8253803 said:
I don't think there's a jump in skill. Taking a longer time to render a piece more elaborately does not mean they have abruptly become better. The artist is using the same set of brushes in post #9793356 as, say, post #9083370, and shading the same way. There is continuity in their work.
Placeholder1996 said:
No, there’s too much detail for me to reasonably believe this is AI-generated, especially in the eyes and eyelashes. If this was machine-created, I’d expect those lines to be screwed up somehow, and they’re not. This is almost certainly human imo.
Thank you for answers.
Just in case, I meant the shadows cast by hair onto the top of the character's breasts and on the arm in the left side of the image. Such crisp thin shadows, first in this artist's uploaded art. Such shadows weren't seen in art, I thought, because hair is supposed to be moving, often transcluent. Thin objects don't cast thin shadows because of light difraction. But AI doesn't discriminate and just draws rhyming patterns of impossible shadows, hardly ever considering the light source, hence the suspicion. My command of art is too poor to lambast the light source vs shadow direction here. And I have mistakingly even took armpit wrinkles (right side of image) for shadow cast by hair at first.
mewandpewinhinur said:
Thank you for answers.
Such shadows weren't seen in art, I thought, because hair is supposed to be moving, often transcluent. Thin objects don't cast thin shadows because of light difraction.
That is fair criticism. But this artist has drawn it before: post #8299275. I figure it's within the freedom of artistic choice though. The sun, when high and not behind clouds, is a very hard light source, so this shadow is still a reasonable rendition.
My command of art is too poor to lambast the light source vs shadow direction here.
The light direction in this image is consistent.
Updated by 8253803
asset #31195604 asset #31285104
This artist says that they don't use AI, that they don't want their art used in AI training, etc. but I feel a bit iffy about certain things. Namely the eyes and the heavy use of blur and chromatic aberration. I think I might just be paranoid and that's just something they like but I need a second pair of eyes to take a look at these.
gunupmyskirt said:
asset #31195604 asset #31285104
This artist says that they don't use AI, that they don't want their art used in AI training, etc. but I feel a bit iffy about certain things. Namely the eyes and the heavy use of blur and chromatic aberration. I think I might just be paranoid and that's just something they like but I need a second pair of eyes to take a look at these.
This looks human because you can see layers of paint, and the hard edges of brushstrokes.
post #9816607 (NSFW)
I want to be really careful pointing fingers since I'm not that confident I can identify ai-generated images as keenly as others, but I do feel serveral things are off in this image that I believe are common in ai-generated works, like for example:
• her diagonal-striped ribbon has a weird blurry texture that's very poor quality
• her saliva has the same coloring as her tongue
• her hair has less details and is more simplified the longer it is, even though it shouldn't be too far away from the pov
• anatomy is strange in some places, like her neck and the way her legs are positioned according to her torso
• artist seems to have come out of nowhere and is producing quality work
• inconsistant cow print bikini in two shots and from page one and two on their other work
• and also inconsistant depth of field like Aru's right arm being blurred despite sharing the same depth as her stomach and Mutsuki's arm.
Before someone points any more fingers, I do believe it is possible that the artist just made some mistakes while drawing, and I'm not out on a witchhunt no matter if it's the work of an accomplished artist or not, but this does set off some alarms bells for me that I think is worth a check.
Myth-of-Stars said:
post #9816607 (NSFW)
I want to be really careful pointing fingers since I'm not that confident I can identify ai-generated images as keenly as others, but I do feel serveral things are off in this image that I believe are common in ai-generated works, like for example:
• her diagonal-striped ribbon has a weird blurry texture that's very poor quality
• her saliva has the same coloring as her tongue
• her hair has less details and is more simplified the longer it is, even though it shouldn't be too far away from the pov
• anatomy is strange in some places, like her neck and the way her legs are positioned according to her torso
• artist seems to have come out of nowhere and is producing quality work
• inconsistant cow print bikini in two shots and from page one and two on their other work
• and also inconsistant depth of field like Aru's right arm being blurred despite sharing the same depth as her stomach and Mutsuki's arm.Before someone points any more fingers, I do believe it is possible that the artist just made some mistakes while drawing, and I'm not out on a witchhunt no matter if it's the work of an accomplished artist or not, but this does set off some alarms bells for me that I think is worth a check.
Linework and shading both look pretty human. These bullet points are either creative choices or human mistakes.
post #9814537 (Questionable)
I can tell this art and all of its works on Pixiv account are clearly AI-generated no other can see it.
rouward said:
post #9814537 (Questionable)
I can tell this art and all of its works on Pixiv account are clearly AI-generated no other can see it.
Is it now? I checked both the artists' twitter accounts and their pixiv account but I couldn't find anything suspicious. Lighting and coloring are a bit plain but that's about it.
But whatever, it's already flagged.
Updated by user 1342552
The artist apparently uploaded Uma Musume slop to his Pixiv two weeks ago. It's the only post tagged as AI there and Pixiv allows its users to tag pictures so I'm not sure what to think of it. Any keen eyes around?
Updated by user 1342552
elchocoloco said:
Is it now? I checked both the artists' twitter accounts and their pixiv account but I couldn't find anything suspicious. Lighting and coloring are a bit plain but that's about it.
But whatever, it's already flagged.
Very well. Though the AI are improving, their posings and positioning are AI's common issues 'cause they're identically the same regardless.
Other works by this artist were also flagged.
elchocoloco said:
The artist apparently uploaded Uma Musume slop to his Pixiv two weeks ago. It's the only post tagged as AI there and Pixiv allows its users to tag pictures so I'm not sure what to think of it. Any keen eyes around?
I very nearly flagged this, but thought I should post here first. The pattern on her kimono looks extremely suspicious to me; lots of artifacts.
ion288 said:
An other flag without a tag. Please tag or refute.
Her shorts look sus.
As the flagger stated, the ribbon on her shirt was the most noticeable thing; it does appear to have AI artifacting there to my eye.
MegaFlare said:
Other works by this artist were also flagged.
I think it may be AI; there’s some melting lines in the hair, especially at the tips and near the eyelashes.
