VR-Man said:
Some random member accused this one for AI ("Ai garbadge" to be precise). What do you guys think?
Yeah, zoom into her eyes, one eye has a mole?
Posted under General
VR-Man said:
Some random member accused this one for AI ("Ai garbadge" to be precise). What do you guys think?
Yeah, zoom into her eyes, one eye has a mole?
Never got an answer for these months-old inquiries.
Updated by MarqFJA87
MarqFJA87 said:
Never got an answer for these months-old inquiries.
The first link is a typo; it links to a comment 16 years old
FivePastNever said:
asset #31697058
not fully sure here
Looks human.
MarqFJA87 said:
Apparently much of artist #401537's work is either entirely AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted. I'm linking the following thread for context.
https://x.com/ZaphnArt/status/1921723133544816916
I'll add https://x.com/Kielix_/status/1922054717619732953. This is an ai-assisted artist, who paints over AI.
Also, artist #350302 is almost certainly using AI to replicate the art style of Mage (harumagedon); the way that the Ranma-chan posts look are practically indistinguishable from those of Mage's.
This might be painted over AI as well, but unlikely directly generated by AI. More specifically, the only approved post seems to be mostly human.
Also, several of rokosannn's are giving me gen-AI vibes. Inconsistent style from one piece to another, occasional suspicious similarity to another established artist's styles, and anomalous hand anatomy that is more often than not associated with gen-AI... I honestly can't shake it.
This doesn't look suspicious to me. All seem to be an amateur artist's style instability.
Updated by 8253803
https://www.pixiv.net/users/113459699
I'm not sure about this new account with only two artworks.
asgembed said:
https://www.pixiv.net/users/113459699
I'm not sure about this new account with only two artworks.
No idea why the aliasing is so bad, but I can't find AI evidence
artist #485271 This artist has one deleted post for ai-generation and 8 active posts, none of which are tagged as such. I think there are signs of generation in the active posts, but I'd like confirmation before I start flagging.
A reasonable suspicion but is there evidence in the image?
Placeholder1996 said:
artist #485271 This artist has one deleted post for ai-generation and 8 active posts, none of which are tagged as such. I think there are signs of generation in the active posts, but I'd like confirmation before I start flagging.
Yeah, all of them have AI artefacts that are not cleaned up.
ion288 said:
A reasonable suspicion but is there evidence in the image?
The lace looks like it has diffusion noise and the pankou looks weird, but i can't say this isn't my confirmation bias
lover animal (bestiality)
Mentioned in forum #365498 by a member. All of the artist’s active posts were tagged AI-gen by another member. Recently a post has been flagged but the rest remain untouched. Thoughts?
artist #522269 has a sharp quality increase starting this year on their Pixiv. There's also some weird "rippling", for example on the skin in post #9493348, not sure what to make of that. The line art and some highlights do match the previous style.
aster1a said:
lover animal (bestiality)
Mentioned in forum #365498 by a member. All of the artist’s active posts were tagged AI-gen by another member. Recently a post has been flagged but the rest remain untouched. Thoughts?
Feet and sometimes hands look strange. Braids look messy. These are suspicious. But I would wait for another opinion.
sousou_no_emilia said:
artist #522269 has a sharp quality increase starting this year on their Pixiv. There's also some weird "rippling", for example on the skin in post #9493348, not sure what to make of that. The line art and some highlights do match the previous style.
I adjusted the levels to exaggerate the skin's contrast.
sousou_no_emilia said:
There's also some weird "rippling", for example on the skin in post #9493348, not sure what to make of that.
8253803 said:
I adjusted the levels to exaggerate the skin's contrast.
You sure it isn't just a form of adversarial noise?
All of this artist's post have been tagged AI-generated, but I want to double-check before doing anything.
They post to their X/BlueSky almost every day (far faster than an actual artist would be able to draw art this complex). Plus it all has that odd shiny quality that AI tends to have.
Knowledge_Seeker said:
All of this artist's post have been tagged AI-generated, but I want to double-check before doing anything.
That’s related to aster1a’s comment above; personally I can’t tell one way or another if the image you linked is AI (I’m not looking at the bestiality posts).
RPS9875 said:
They post to their X/BlueSky almost every day (far faster than an actual artist would be able to draw art this complex). Plus it all has that odd shiny quality that AI tends to have.
I don’t see anything definitively AI in their posts (I could be missing something); it’s also worth noting a glossy look on it’s own is not enough evidence for AI generation.
RPS9875 said:
They post to their X/BlueSky almost every day (far faster than an actual artist would be able to draw art this complex). Plus it all has that odd shiny quality that AI tends to have.
I haven't found anything suspicious from the art either. Their Twitter and BlueSky posts look more frequent than their actual art release speed because they re-post a lot of drawings in the form of different merch designs.
Flag without a tag. Artists other posts are tagged and deleted. Should I just tag it?
Updated by ion288