AI-generated art check thread

ion288 said:

post #9867598

Flag without a tag. Artists other posts are tagged and deleted. Should I just tag it?

I couldn't see any clear signs of ai-generation in this post (there were a few suspicious spots, but none conclusive); however, I looked at another of their posts on Pixiv which has obvious AI artifacts. I think it's safe to say this is an AI-prompter account. I added the tag and wrote a note for the artist's page telling users not to upload their posts.

Edit: I looked at the flagged post again and spotted some AI-artifacts to the right of the tail. Definitely a prompter.

I need some opinion about this, since I'm not sure it's AI or not https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=airbus_a350xwb&z=1

Massonia said:

I need some opinion about this, since I'm not sure it's AI or not https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=airbus_a350xwb&z=1

No, I think there’s too much detail for there to be no human involvement; the eyes in post #9877245, for example. At the very least, it’s ai-assisted, but I personally doubt that too.

asset #31800313

Having doubts.

artist hshhs20679

Art style is inconsistent on their Twitter page as well as some minor errors in some of the art pieces (such as buttons on both sides of a jacket)

Hello Danbooru community,

I’d like to ask if I’m allowed to upload my AI-generated works to the site, provided that all of them receive manual retouching and editing (I work hard to remove AI artifacts).

In the upload rules I read that “Fully AI-generated art with no human input aside from prompting” isn’t allowed. After I uploaded my works, a moderator told me that AI-generated content isn’t allowed at all. After I explained that they were retouched, they suggested I ask here in this thread, so here I am. You can view my posts under the artist tag: superkica

I value the community rules and hope I can share my work here.

for our purposes, "human input" generally means things like an artist drawing from an ai-generated reference or manually tracing an ai image from scratch. you might want to check out https://aibooru.online, which is another booru (not affiliated with danbooru) specifically tailored for sharing ai-made images.

wingdings said:

for our purposes, "human input" generally means things like an artist drawing from an ai-generated reference or manually tracing an ai image from scratch. you might want to check out https://aibooru.online, which is another booru (not affiliated with danbooru) specifically tailored for sharing ai-made images.

thank you for your reply, this is indeed a more suitable site for this type of work.

MaskedAvenger said:

asset #31800313

Having doubts.

This might be AI. Look at what happens at the bottom of the image. The hair melts into the sand, it has the same color at that point and there’s no line separating them. More noticeably, the leg is thicker on one side of the hair than the other; at the very least that’s a noticeable artistic error, but I think it might be AI-related. Never mind about the sand part, I mistook the sand for more hair. My point about the leg stands. Although, the rest of the image doesn’t look too suspicious, so I’m unsure now. I need a second opinion.

Farm said:

artist hshhs20679

Art style is inconsistent on their Twitter page as well as some minor errors in some of the art pieces (such as buttons on both sides of a jacket)

https://x.com/hshhs20679/status/1938012158694199599 Weird collar and undefined sidelock

https://x.com/hshhs20679/status/1939898081891557405 Sidelock and hair behind ear merge at the tip

https://x.com/hshhs20679/status/1945858033021550947 Strange ring finger

https://x.com/hshhs20679/status/1952960124357599418 Bad frills

https://x.com/hshhs20679/status/1954307441597796659 Shorts' drawstrings don't make sense

Newer works have more obscured details, but I'm suspicious enough that I wouldn't upload anything.

Placeholder1996 said:

This might be AI. Look at what happens at the bottom of the image. The hair melts into the sand, it has the same color at that point and there’s no line separating them. More noticeably, the leg is thicker on one side of the hair than the other; at the very least that’s a noticeable artistic error, but I think it might be AI-related. Never mind about the sand part, I mistook the sand for more hair. My point about the leg stands. Although, the rest of the image doesn’t look too suspicious, so I’m unsure now. I need a second opinion.

The hair could be blocking the bottom half of the leg. This picture does have some strangely-shaped color patches, but I can't really find hard evidence.

artist reinova

Has one post deleted for being AI, the three that were freshly uploaded, the hair and hands just don't sit right with me. The twitter is rife with AI retweets, too.

The uploader of all three has multiple posts deleted for being AI generated too, if that matters.

ToxicOrochi said:

artist reinova

Has one post deleted for being AI, the three that were freshly uploaded, the hair and hands just don't sit right with me. The twitter is rife with AI retweets, too.

The uploader of all three has multiple posts deleted for being AI generated too, if that matters.

100% AI. Tons of artifacts in all three pending works.

Is this ai generated ? pixiv #134131144 if it isn't I don't know if the manga ? confirms that they are the artist or not

yuristheway said:

Is this ai generated ? pixiv #134131144 if it isn't I don't know if the manga ? confirms that they are the artist or not

I don’t think so. The fishnet thighhighs look a little weird, but I’m not sure if that’s AI or just the way they were drawn. Nothing else in the image seemed suspicious to me.

Placeholder1996 said:

I don’t think so. The fishnet thighhighs look a little weird, but I’m not sure if that’s AI or just the way they were drawn. Nothing else in the image seemed suspicious to me.

Hmm ok thank you

Not sure if this is the place to follow up but for lack of a better place to do so, was any kind of consensus reached regarding moetsukita and the works that have been deleted? Should they be appealed or just left as is?

I ask because I see that another piece from them has been uploaded, but not tagged with any ai tags as of when I'm making this post. post #9897589 to be precise.

Having said that and looking at the deleted posts it looks like at least one if not multiple members out of the approvers also believe their pieces to be AI generated, judging by the comment "If this is supposedly AI-assisted rather than fully generated, then it definitely feels like the AI did over 90% of the work." that's on quite a few of the rejections in the moderation queue.

I saw that there was something floated about potentially appealing the deleted works, but it seems that was never done?

Grahf said:

Not sure if this is the place to follow up but for lack of a better place to do so, was any kind of consensus reached regarding moetsukita and the works that have been deleted? Should they be appealed or just left as is?

I ask because I see that another piece from them has been uploaded, but not tagged with any ai tags as of when I'm making this post. post #9897589 to be precise.

Having said that and looking at the deleted posts it looks like at least one if not multiple members out of the approvers also believe their pieces to be AI generated, judging by the comment "If this is supposedly AI-assisted rather than fully generated, then it definitely feels like the AI did over 90% of the work." that's on quite a few of the rejections in the moderation queue.

I saw that there was something floated about potentially appealing the deleted works, but it seems that was never done?

I have no problem with tagging them ai-assisted and appealing them so approvers can judge their merit with the premise of AI assistance in mind, but seeing the results of past appeals I don't think any future appeal is likely to be approved.

I suggest adding ai-assisted to post #9897589 but it doesn't seem to need flagging.

redhornyhead

Uses AI to generate intermediate frames between keyframes. Obvious if you pause at the right time.

Example (NSFW): asset #31831866 from post #9689276, asset #31831887 from post #9441979

Need help to decide if the keyframes are human or AI, and if human, whether the posts have enough merit to stay.

post #9485348

I'm twitter impaired so I cant verify the link in the flag. Ai-assisted?