The joke is that the word pronounced "taco" in Japanese translates to "octopus" in English. Additionally, telling someone "Kono Taco!" ("You are octopus") in Japanese carries a nuance of "You are stupid".
The joke is that the word pronounced "taco" in Japanese translates to "octopus" in English. Additionally, telling someone "Kono Taco!" ("You are octopus") in Japanese carries a nuance of "You are stupid".
I've also seen people on Reddit use tacos as a joke about having tacos for dinner whenever that fat orange blob doesn't do as he claims he'll do.
We had a transgender tag, but it's gone. Because here's the thing, tagging guidelines for trans characters are complete bullshit, since it's supposed to be "tag what you see", unless it's traps because why the fuck does that tag still exist; but even in cases where you can't tell otherwise, like in this image, canonical genitals take priority.
We had a transgender tag, but it's gone. Because here's the thing, tagging guidelines for trans characters are complete bullshit, since it's supposed to be "tag what you see", unless it's traps because why the fuck does that tag still exist; but even in cases where you can't tell otherwise, like in this image, canonical genitals take priority.
Most "trans" characters are only so from localizer meddling and lgbt community's insistent headcanons. Having that tag means endless edit wars.
Just create a tag like: "Canonical/official_trangender", it's a no-brainer.
It is indeed a no-brainer, because that is a completely brainless suggestion. Canonical/official as opposed to what? Headcanon trans people? How would that even be taggable? The issue isn't a lack of a tag, since we have tags which can be used for art explicitly depicting someone as trans, the issue is the guidelines for gender tagging, which as I said make no sense for SFW rated art. If it's NSFW then it at least makes sense for the purpose of the blacklist, but otherwise it's tagging an informed attribute instead of a visible one. Plus, tagging post-transition characters as such when it isn't the topic of the image is just gross, and I mean both social and surgical transitions.
Omutsu said: I like how "personification" just means "The same pokemon, but with random stripes and colored bits".
Maybe you're just used to fanart but the actual Pokemon aren't nearly as human-like as these are. Apart from the clothing, Gardevoir the Pokemon doesn't have tits.
NekoKnight36 said: Maybe you're just used to fanart but the actual Pokemon aren't nearly as human-like as these are. Apart from the clothing, Gardevoir the Pokemon doesn't have tits.
Of course they don't, but there's still nothing human about these. They still have the red protruding bits, the white skin, the horn-things on their head, etc. Slapping breasts on a Pokemon doesn't make it a personification.
I think they should all be annotated correctly, only one I wasn't completely sure about was the thing with its tongue out which is next to Jungle Pocket, Agnes Tachyon, and Manhattan Cafe. Guessing based off context I assume it's supposed to be Dantsu Flame but I may be wrong.
In case you're not aware, almost all horses in Umamusume have their fates known, and none of them involve a slaughterhouse.
Besides, since horse racing became mainstream no owner of a competing horse would survive the public finding out that they were simply disposed of before or after retirement.
Ya dawg, its a game. You're complaining about tsundere girls in an anime image board? 🙄
No, I made a joke, and apparently everyone disagrees with my definition of funny. Meh, it happens, wasn't the first time, won't be the last time. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
No, I made a joke, and apparently everyone disagrees with my definition of funny. Meh, it happens, wasn't the first time, won't be the last time. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-oh i said something stupid, i'm gonna say it was an joke, i'm pretty smart. Bruh
Leave a comment