Updated
Posted under General
Updated
Anything specific about that one? Looks perfectly fine to me on it's own, even more so compared to the rest of the artist's works. Apparently only one moderator looked at it, too.
Vicpl said:
Anything specific about that one? Looks perfectly fine to me on it's own, even more so compared to the rest of the artist's works. Apparently only one moderator looked at it, too.
There's nothing wrong proportionally, but the composition of the image isn't very good. The brown of the background has very little contrast with her brown hair and the dark peach of her skin shading, and the shading itself is roughshod. Flat coloring/shading doesn't reduce an image's quality by any means, but here it was just executed poorly with lots of sharp angles that weren't properly smoothed out, while the lineart is generally uniform and very wide.
Is there a reason for not keeping this on Danbooru? Colorings, shades, and anatomy are also nothing to complain. And it's not that these two are getting many fanarts at all. Yuri in DB is also rare.
The eyes are like this in the anime, if that is what's making this 'ugly'.
Marqant said:
Is there a reason for not keeping this on Danbooru? Colorings, shades, and anatomy are also nothing to complain. And it's not that these two are getting many fanarts at all. Yuri in DB is also rare.
The eyes are like this in the anime, if that is what's making this 'ugly'.
I don't think there are any issues with the images, just a mismatch in interest by the approvers. You can appeal them in the Deletion Appeal thread and have some of the more moderate approvers take a look. Dragonball is just a really niche subject that would have a hard time passing approval except by Contributors, just like Touken Ranbu and Jojo, among others.
Pepsi-Coma said:
Can I ask why this pic was deleted? There are at least 5 pics with the same pussy. Still they are here.
That’s pretty much three strikes. Upload your edits elsewhere if you want to share them.
Is there anything specifically wrong with these two that I've missed that I should take into account for future uploads?
Omegamagnum said:
Is there anything specifically wrong with these two that I've missed that I should take into account for future uploads?
post #2749774
What sticks out to me is that the shading is weird. A lot of work obviously went into it, but it still looks somewhat amateurish and plastic-y. The hand, glasses and ears are especially meh. Shadows are quite inconsistent. Inconsistent shading and shadows easily make an image look off, even though the viewer might not be able to pinpoint the cause.
Considering that the abs are featured prominently, the sixpack looks just stuck on because there’s not much matching muscle elsewhere. A minor issue compared to shading and shadows.
post #2749025
The face looks a bit wonky, but it’s a minor issue and the post was good enough for approval.
Chimera99 said:
Kantai colletion
8 days
MMD
I posted similer work like post #2678171 & post #2688272.
Appreciated
Updated
post #2750192
post #2750194
Is there anything wrong with these pictures or maybe they just don't belong on this site?
Renataki said:
post #2750192
post #2750194
Is there anything wrong with these pictures or maybe they just don't belong on this site?
Not a Japanese copyright and not particularly anime-styled either. While there is some of such art on this site, many users think it doesn’t belong here and you’ll have a hard time getting it approved. I suggest you stay away from it.
There’s also currently a discussion going on about uploading patreon rewards. From what I understand, the majority is leaning towards that uploading patreon rewards is discouraged unless explicitly allowed by the artist.
Renataki said:
post #2750192
post #2750194
Is there anything wrong with these pictures or maybe they just don't belong on this site?
These pictures where already rejected from when I uploaded the free versions days before you did. As it stands, approvers are becoming more reluctant to approve Patreon rewards so on that alone it could potentially be rejected. Also the style is just too on the side of western and away from eastern/anime. It's hard to delineate where that point is; there is a standard however called WWW which some approvers use to assess images. It stands for western artist, western copyright, western style. If an image is all three of those things its likely to be rejected for not being relevant enough to the site. There is some gray areas however. I uploaded my posts of it since it had a semblance to Princess Peach and I wanted to see if it would be accepted.
So it was rejected because it's exclusive Patreon content which is sort of taboo, because it's a mostly western influenced art piece, and because some nearly identical versions of it were rejected just days prior to your upload.
Also you should be able to see on those posts rejection reasons. One post, it says 1 moderator rejected it for breaking site rules and for the other it's 2.
CodeKyuubi said:
Some people are making a big deal of it, but apparently albert is fine with uploading patreon rewards until the artist asks for them to be banned/removed, so that's how it is.
Well, Approvers should approach pending posts with their point of view. So it is also only a valid reason to also bring up Patreon reward, because the approver might fear to receive takedown requests from the artist if too much Patreon rewards are active here.