Apollyon said:
The former gets flagged for perceived problems that are only a part of the perspective without somehow ruining the artwork outright, approved, then hastily flagged again by the approver after they were told to do a "quality check" on their own approved posts (forum #130998, forum #131033). The latter gets flagged 4 days after upload for a similar reason as the former, but only on the same day the parent was flagged again.
Given those details and that other images featuring this copyright were flagged during that time period, I'm going to call the intentions behind the flagging into question. Because it should be asked if these were flagged because they were actually totally terrible pictures that should be deleted from general view, or if they were flagged simply because said flagger has a personal issue with seeing any post under the wendy's tag.
The original parent seemed popular enough, as are select other posts under wendy's, divisive meme or otherwise. And nearly every one of those flagged images were reapproved. So I'm not convinced of the idea that these posts, which don't even have much of a presence outside of that one set recently uploaded, are like some malignant tumor on the site.
I don't see any outstanding issue with the foreshortening, personally. As far as I know, some people have the perception that anime-style art for western copyrights by Western artists is somehow western-style, all the while accepting western-style art for western copyrights (Overwatch, among others) by Asian artists.