Danbooru

Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Posted under General

archaist said:

It certainly isn't generic porn fanart.

Funny thing is, its not fanart. Those are our character designs. Not some characters in the game. I have seen other peoples stuff that have been approved far more explicit then what i have and aren't considered "fanart" but alright

Larkane said:

Funny thing is, its not fanart. Those are our character designs. Not some characters in the game. I have seen other peoples stuff that have been approved far more explicit then what i have and aren't considered "fanart" but alright

Well, it has been approved.
But directly afterward, it has been flagged. Since you asked for feedback, I'd recommend to read the flag reason.
To be honest, I personally also don't think that the errors are severe enough to warrant a deletion, but I can't decide what stays and what doesn't.

Larkane said:

I will totally admit my responses earlier were because i was totally skipped in reviews and I got a bit over zealous. I will apologize for that at least Mikaeri and archaist

It's fine, just as long as you take a moment to think before acting on something.

As I've mentioned earlier to someone else, explicit images have a tougher time getting approved, and sometimes if not usually will be put to higher scrutiny. The quantity of explicitness doesn't matter just as long as the quality is up to snuff. That being said, the whole "bland" thing was a little uncalled for. I'd hope my curations are liked, otherwise I wouldn't contribute them here.

Mikaeri said:

It's fine, just as long as you take a moment to think before acting on something.

As I've mentioned earlier to someone else, explicit images have a tougher time getting approved, and sometimes if not usually will be put to higher scrutiny. The quantity of explicitness doesn't matter just as long as the quality is up to snuff. That being said, the whole "bland" thing was a little uncalled for. I'd hope my curations are liked, otherwise I wouldn't contribute them here.

I think it was just cause i saw 4 others aftter me get comments and I got nothing on mine... So it was just me being butt hurt.

post #2688295
Was flagged for
"quality check: anatomy (legs, right girl's hip/pelvic anatomy), shading"

I will say from RL experiences i have seen anatomy just fine like this before. The shading i do not see a problem with myself.

Can I please get a check on this one? :)

Kapten-N said:

I'm wondering why post #2681549 was not approved.

I'm not an approver, so I'm not sure I should be doing this but...

Those faces look utterly horrendous, especially in that third panel. Eyes are misaligned, facial features are skewed, their head looks disconnected from their neck, and it's just horrible to look at. Only the ladybugs look half-decent. I can't think of any reason to approve this at all.

GiantCaveMushroom said:

I'm not an approver, so I'm not sure I should be doing this but...

Those faces look utterly horrendous, especially in that third panel. Eyes are misaligned, facial features are skewed, their head looks disconnected from their neck, and it's just horrible to look at. Only the ladybugs look half-decent. I can't think of any reason to approve this at all.

I think the worst part is that it's not visually interesting. We've already seen comics of characters reacting to animals mating.

Kagerou_Pic_Bot said:

post #2695698
post #2695275
post #2695272

This artist has issues with anatomy, most visible on the hands, and coloring. At least I think that that foggy/matte coloring doesn’t look very good. Third image also has kind of a derpy face. Overall, the artist still has ways to go. Except for post #2658520 and post #2658531, which are drawn in a different style, all other approved posts by this artist barely made it above the threshold. I suggest staying away from this artist for another while.

post #2694231

Bad pelvis anatomy, legs seem to have a different length, unless they’re weirdly angled in a way that doesn’t really fit the pose. ... and are that six fingers on that hand?

post #2688833 (A bit basic, but I think it's still decent enough.)

Yeah, rather basic. This one’s obviously the best of the bunch, but only because the others are so bad.

Kagerou_Pic_Bot said:

Since my previous post went ignored, I'm going to post again.

post #2695698
post #2695275
post #2695272
post #2694231
post #2688833 (A bit basic, but I think it's still decent enough.)

I don't think you've really picked up from your last feedback though, concerning this stuff. NWS pretty much explained it in detail in forum #128957.

If I wanted to add anything to what he said, it's basically that approvers are only being *really nice* if they approve something as mediocre as the post he linked. Generally uninteresting and flat shading, lack of an intriguing motif... I can list off a ton of other things that bother me about those images (including the last one). Just because an artist's work has been approved before doesn't say anything about newer or older works. 2nd and 3rd are just plain boring with strangely stiff and awkward poses, and the last is just... It's way too basic.

You need to really wrap your head around what is actually good and what isn't. Just because a post has nothing critically wrong about it doesn't mean it's going to survive the queue. If you want to get an idea of what you should upload, look at the other uploaders around you that recently got promoted or on the way to being promoted. RyuZU, archaist, poppoko to name a few.

Shigentsu said:

i am super late in posting this but only recently found out about this forum. I posted this pic post #2550946 it got deleted although pics by the same artist that were similar post #2550943 post #2550947 were approved. wut up with that?
also this pic post #2550936 by the same artist was deleted.

I can't see anything since I have yaoi blacklisted, but male-only pictures are not very popular on Danbooru. The userbase is overwhelmingly hetero, though I can't say anything about gender ratios, and many male-only pics are generally posted by Contributor-class uploaders who don't have to go through the queue.

Well, there's that, and also in regards to yaoi content, it is treated with higher scrutiny as with the other less-liked tags such as furry.

Although my main complaint with those is that they don't really seem all that interesting to me -- last post is SFW and looks a little bland, and the other 3 don't seem like much other than fetish porn. My 2c. Provence was the approver for those those middle two, but he's no longer an approver here.

Compared to the other two pictures in the set, post #2550946 has a more oddly-shaped face, and also some possible questionable perspective with how the arms are positioned. In general, the artist's content seems to sit on the borderline, so it's probably best to use a bit more scrutiny when uploading from them.

(Tongue-in-cheek question: Would having approvers ask themselves "would I like this with boobs?" be a viable solution for hetero bias?)

feline_lump said:

(Tongue-in-cheek question: Would having approvers ask themselves "would I like this with boobs?" be a viable solution for hetero bias?)

That won't work. Futas and actual men are looked upon pretty differently.

1 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 359