post #9840544 (9 approvers)
post #9842420 (9 approvers)
post #9814027
Any reason why these posts weren't approved? They aren't that different compared to other artists styles and they are all pretty well drawn as well
Posted under General
post #9840544 (9 approvers)
post #9842420 (9 approvers)
post #9814027
Any reason why these posts weren't approved? They aren't that different compared to other artists styles and they are all pretty well drawn as well
A few days ago, I posted some official concept art from The Super Mario Bros. Movie which were recreations of paintings from Super Mario 64. The ones for Bob-omb Battlefield, Jolly Roger Bay, and Tiny-Huge Island were all approved, but the ones for Cool, Cool Mountain (post #9864675) and Wet-Dry World (post #9865042) were not.
Not really sure what I need to do here. I was uploading pics from a set an artist did. Two out of the four current pics were deleted due to disinterest but in that case then the set is incomplete and I don't really understand why it was deleted. I followed protocol as I was told to in a previous mail about one of my uploads so I don't really know what I could be doing differently
Edit: it turns out it was 3 out of the 4 I posted. Which doesn't make sense. These are the sequel of a previous set posted by the artist which I posted before. The only one in this set that was approved was the second one. Nothing else was said other than disinterest so I don't know what I can do to fix thatpost #9861150
post #9861181
post #9861200
Edit: thank you to whoever appealed for my posts and got them approved!
Updated by Valkenheim
For post #8495945, looking at it, the major quibble that I can point out myself would be about her breast placement being a bit high or thighs being a little too thick, but maybe someone might forgive that since other than those the shading and colouring seems solid, idk but I'm putting this up here anyway to wait and see
Anyway I still think post #8519814 and/or post #8519816 should get a second chance since looking at those works don't give me anything off about them at first glance
Ditto for the Beidou set in post #8499914
Updated by Searchwanted
post #9853429 (G)
post #9422659 (S)post #9747781 (S) Thanks, Dan!
post #9870746 (S)
post #9870936 (Q)
If anyone could give these a second chance, please and thank you.
Updated by Historyanon
post #4853595
post #5028107
post #5053032
post #5055915
post #5055925
post #5057864
post #5587316
post #8531403
post #8712693
post #9200205
post #9323689
These posts are all revisions and/or larger versions of previously uploaded posts.
post #9872968 (larger version of post #9660770. Compared to Pixiv, Twitter compresses images more heavily.)
Updated by MuriyaTensei
post #9851031 is part of a big set of rare official promotional art image scans from Gundam by a notable artist. I hope it can be reconsidered so the set is complete.
Updated by Kronnang Dunn
post #9820264
post #9829415post #9847397
post #9848850 (parent post was approved)
post #9855319
post #9868827
post #9870567
any feedback on these?
Updated by user 881800
https://safebooru.donmai.us/posts/9742969?q=user%3Aakaruakari
https://safebooru.donmai.us/posts/9742981?q=user%3Aakaruakari
https://safebooru.donmai.us/posts/9742990?q=user%3Aakaruakari
uninteresting is valid, other than that, specific art criticism would be appreciated.
wondering why this wasn't approved? is it not high quality enough?
Why was this not approved? https://safebooru.donmai.us/posts/9859795?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ASineFineBelli
i honestly don't get why all of these are deleted, please give feedback or a second look or anything
post #9807911
post #9807819
post #9710808
post #9710799post #9569088
post #9564137
post #9488688post #9477055post #9476915
post #9476778
and i get that this set isnt to everyone's tastes but imo that shouldn't offset how well drawn it is
post #9563499
post #9563495
post #9563492
Updated by zenzeni99
I don't know why post #9872506 wasn't approved but post #9876065 was. They're the same quality from the same artist with the same character posted a day apart from each other. Approvers seem to be completely random in whether or not they like this artist when I look at the other deleted art by this artist too.
AngelFlash said:
I don't know why post #9872506 wasn't approved but post #9876065 was. They're the same quality from the same artist with the same character posted a day apart from each other. Approvers seem to be completely random in whether or not they like this artist when I look at the other deleted art by this artist too.
I didn't approve the post you highlighted but a key difference to me is that the knee for post #9872506 looks kinda weird, something not present on the approved post.
Hopefully this "are there any objective issues? I can see why these wouldn't be interesting to individual approvers but" post isn't too soon after the platinum raffle; these appeals were from before that. These are two sets of images, not five individual images.
post #9582048
post #9582049
NSFW, fetish-y (rubber human pet suits), only 9 reviews on appeal
post #9632605
post #9632607
post #9632609
SFW, furry-by-tagging-standards but also in line with other uploads by the artist
Thanks again!