post #9872188 (Official art)
post #9872204 (Official art)
post #9872210 (Official art)
post #9871864
post #9872290 (Alt of approved post)
post #9872346post #9876702
post #9876724post #9876748
post #9877637
Updated by bob1159
Posted under General
post #9872188 (Official art)
post #9872204 (Official art)
post #9872210 (Official art)
post #9871864
post #9872290 (Alt of approved post)
post #9872346post #9876702
post #9876724post #9876748
post #9877637
Updated by bob1159
post #9830648post #9832327
post #9825247
post #9878717(offical art)
post #9830684
Please give a chance
Updated by wrrrreww12
No clue why this didn't make it through, I suspect it was just overlooked somehow but it seems pretty solid quality-wise. Any feedback?
All other art by advos is active. Is there anything uniquely low-quality about this one?
Update: Thanks vipguy64!
Updated by drinkyourvegetables
post #9861286 and post #9861327
post #9871098 was approved and the other 2 are just differences of this post.
MuriyaTensei said:
post #9872968 (larger version of post #9660770. Compared to Pixiv, Twitter compresses images more heavily.)
@MuriyaTensei Doesn't matter, it's a pixel-perfect duplicate. File size doesn't matter in this case as the pixels of the image are the exact same regardless of the differences in platform compression. Don't change yours to be the parent after someone already tagged and parented it properly.
parts of a variant set
post #9885181
post #9885182
higher-res version
post #9749205
post #9718266
post #9679074
post #9416764
complete versionpost #9570472
Updated by staxu
WRS said:
@MuriyaTensei Doesn't matter, it's a pixel-perfect duplicate. File size doesn't matter in this case as the pixels of the image are the exact same regardless of the differences in platform compression. Don't change yours to be the parent after someone already tagged and parented it properly.
ok, i know. thank you
post #9847115 (parent post #9847104)
post #9830201 (parent post #9819461)
I have already appealed it a long time ago. And I even posted it. I still don't know what could be wrong with it. Please re-review.
post #9879740 (Unapproved in 3 days.)
Anyone interested in this ?
NihilArchive said:
post #9879740 (Unapproved in 3 days.)
The fingers are weird and coloring is kind faded.
Metalhead33 said:
I have already appealed it a long time ago. And I even posted it. I still don't know what could be wrong with it. Please re-review.
Being a incredibly absurdres is amazing, but style is generic, character's faces are almost all the same, effects and details are sloppy.
Alto1867 said:
Anyone interested in this ?
It was approved. But why is tagged as 'Sensitive'?
Trailside said:
No clue why this didn't make it through, I suspect it was just overlooked somehow but it seems pretty solid quality-wise. Any feedback?
It's good, and I believe in your suspect, but yeah, probably was overlooked and wasn't interesting.