ZeroFiveSeven said:
Because all Hoyo writers are capable of is giving characters super tragic backstories. Yuzuha already filled that slot so they had to improvise.
It is actually harder to find ANY Hoyo character without any kind of tragic backstories. So far it seems only Klee does.
Also, Alice is actually capable of wielding multiple fencing foils, as far as her demo demonstrates.
ZeroFiveSeven said:
Because all Hoyo writers are capable of is giving characters super tragic backstories. Yuzuha already filled that slot so they had to improvise.
How is this related to writing? I know that hating on Hoyo is mainstream and popular among miserable and brainless people but damn, didn't know it was that bad
ZeroFiveSeven said:
Because all Hoyo writers are capable of is giving characters super tragic backstories. Yuzuha already filled that slot so they had to improvise.
Its more likely because using two rapiers is way harder and less effective than using just one. This also has nothing to do with character writing.
Low-key company connection if we consider that WarThunder and Umamusume are both serviced by DMM in Japan.
Moerukaze said:
No wonder she's at mood poor, she's playing a Tiger, suffering because of the German mains at 6.0
The only one in the team that probably angled smh
Sigfried666 said:
Guess he thinks all khyle.'s art must be a cohesive single AU.
To be fair, that has been my headcanon just for fun.
A magical place where Ashido Mina is banned from several hotels for excessive damage, where Frieren has met Pope francis and Jesus, Aqua sells Flex Tape, the characters from Doki Doki Literature Club are agressive lesbians, Astolfo has ties to US politics and Andrew Tate, Tatsumaki lost her World Of Warcraft account, encounters with Pokemon are surprisingly violent, Kobayashi is guilty of domestic abuse, and where Toga Himiko became a happy mother.
GabrielWB said:
To be fair, that has been my headcanon just for fun.
A magical place where Ashido Mina is banned from several hotels for excessive damage, where Frieren has met Pope francis and Jesus, Aqua sells Flex Tape, the characters from Doki Doki Literature Club are agressive lesbians, Astolfo has ties to US politics and Andrew Tate, Tatsumaki lost her World Of Warcraft account, encounters with Pokemon are surprisingly violent, Kobayashi is guilty of domestic abuse, and where Toga Himiko became a happy mother.
Exactly. All consistently repeated jokes with same relationships, but Genos just magically is fully organic and the only blonde person in existence. And I'm supposed to be the crazy one for pointing out that the cyborg that's been consistently been portrayed as a cyborg in every iteration by the same artist isn't in the picture because the person and the cyborg has the same hair color.
CitrusC said:
Exactly. All consistently repeated jokes with same relationships, but Genos just magically is fully organic and the only blonde person in existence. And I'm supposed to be the crazy one for pointing out that the cyborg that's been consistently been portrayed as a cyborg in every iteration by the same artist isn't in the picture because the person and the cyborg has the same hair color.
Okay grandpa, enough about your wild unsubastantiated lizard-people Illuminati conspiracy theories, it's time for your medicine.
GreyOmega said:
Cyborg or not, that's not something you shove up there. Of course people have gone to the hospital for shoving up worse... sadly.
This reminds me of the Serbian bottle incident. A Serbian farmer went to the doctors because he shoved a bottle up his ass, but claimed that he was attacked by Albanians, and this caused the Yugoslav wars.
Wait a minute. These posts were tagged with chelly (glisten chelly) and third-party source. And the URL is not listed in the artist entry, which means it’s possible the person complaining didn’t draw this after all.
@Siwan Are you absolutely sure these tags are correct?
And @c6343j6297, don’t clear out the tags from posts. They’re just be reverted and you’ll be banned. Filing a DMCA request is the only way. Also, it’s kinda hypocritical to criticize us of freely uploading others’ artwork when your user record shows you doing the same thing with works from artists that specifically asked us not to post any of them.
@Blank_User I found the post when the account wasn't private which is sometimes ago before it got privated, the account stated it was chelly's work.
When the pics were upload, they were on website for a while until they were posted and tagged it yesterday. It is my mistake for not checking properly.
Siwan said:
@Blank_User I found the post when the account wasn't private which is sometimes ago before it got privated, the account stated it was chelly's work.
When the pics were upload, they were on website for a while until they were posted and tagged it yesterday. It is my mistake for not checking properly.
I deleted them over a week ago, you bunch of thieves—uploading someone’s privately commissioned work without their consent!!
Do you even know how much I paid for these two illustrations?
And why did I delete them? Because I knew people like you would just upload them to other websites without the original creator’s permission.
Blank_User said:
Wait a minute. These posts were tagged with chelly (glisten chelly) and third-party source. And the URL is not listed in the artist entry, which means it’s possible the person complaining didn’t draw this after all.
@Siwan Are you absolutely sure these tags are correct?
And @c6343j6297, don’t clear out the tags from posts. They’re just be reverted and you’ll be banned. Filing a DMCA request is the only way. Also, it’s kinda hypocritical to criticize us of freely uploading others’ artwork when your user record shows you doing the same thing with works from artists that specifically asked us not to post any of them.
This is a private work. Stealing someone else’s work and then loudly calling it “freedom”? How much did you pay to buy this artwork? Can’t you even understand that the original links to these two illustrations were deleted a long time ago? The DMCA was filed long ago, and you’ve done nothing to address it.
You upload illustrations that others have deleted without permission, and then you accuse the original creator?
Haha, a thief is still a thief.
c6343j6297 said:
This is a private work. Stealing someone else’s work and then loudly calling it “freedom”? How much did you pay to buy this artwork? Can’t you even understand that the original links to these two illustrations were deleted a long time ago? The DMCA was filed long ago, and you’ve done nothing to address it.
You upload illustrations that others have deleted without permission, and then you accuse the original creator?Haha, a thief is still a thief.
I'm having a hard time understanding what you mean, because you are making a scene and not explaining anything.
You commissioned those images, meaning you paid the artist to make those images and give them directly to you.
So those pieces belong to you, since you are the one who paid for them.
How come there was a publicly acessible tweet with those images you had to delete?
You say you "already deleted the tweet" and that "those images were never made public", but that makes no sense.
Had they never been made public, they wouldn't have ended up here in any form.
Also, those are digital images. They are a completely different beast than a physical painting or photograph.
You claim this is theft, but those are merely files, data. You should still have the "original" with you.
The presence of this artwork here does no damage at all to you, there is nothing lost.
Had you really wanted total and exclusive possession of the art so that no other living being would even look at it (that sounds like a mental disease, seriously) you should not have shared it on a tweet.
c6343j6297 said:
Do you even know how much I paid for these two illustrations?
There's your problem. You paid for these, which makes you the commissioner, not the artist. Therefore, you don't have standing to file a DMCA request. The only one who can legitimately request the art to be taken down is the person that actually drew it.
Bootywarrior69 said:
Is this towards the player or the Commander? If this towards the Commander it's confirmed the Commander packing heat between his legs.
Trying to do NTR work towards the Commander is really funny when you remember he canonically lays pipe, is build af to the point of being able to stabilize someone firing a gun, and has giant dick.
Omegamagnum said:
Trying to do NTR work towards the Commander is really funny when you remember he canonically lays pipe, is build af to the point of being able to stabilize someone firing a gun, and has giant dick.
Nice to see someone else who gets this. The Commander also has a healing factor so he probably has excellent stimina as well.
I pray he has a passive something like if you do like three gluttony res he makes it so rupture count can't drop during that turn, I think it would really solve all of ruptures issues...though I wish he didn't take up tingtang gang leaders passive bonus, that Damage bonus would have been nice...
