You know, i created the original pool #16720 for lady formi and three years later yuuka's depleted uranium thighs now populate nearly half of all posts under fat joke. a new pool for the new schwarzchild radius queen is probably in order. gonna make it happen later today when i have time.
You know, i created the original pool #16720 for lady formi and three years later yuuka's depleted uranium thighs now populate nearly half of all posts under fat joke. a new pool for the new schwarzchild radius queen is probably in order. gonna make it happen later today when i have time.
If we have a tag specifically for jokes about a character being heavy, do we really need pools that are just "character + fat joke"?
If we have a tag specifically for jokes about a character being heavy, do we really need pools that are just "character + fat joke"?
Probably yes, at least in formi's case. a lot of the images in pool #16720 does not actually qualify for tag fat joke as they are more subtle and humourous in nature and tend to be fully featured illustrations (eg post #3655712post #4243361) rather than crude mean jokes pics solely to poke fun of her weight. the pool currently has 47 entries and only 23 has fat joke tagged.
As for yuuka, i don't really search for her pic often and ive only seen overtly fat joke pics of her so far but there are a few more subtle or implied ones. if we can find more like this then certainly we could have a pool for her i guess.
Honestly, anything in the Formidable pool itself that can't be tagged with fat_joke probably shouldn't be in the pool. I honestly have no idea what it is about post #3655712 (or its child post) that qualifies it for the pool, and post #4243361 probably should have the fat joke tag added to it.
The only images I could see fitting into that pool without needing the fat joke tag are ones like post #4200295 that focus specifically on the weight of Formidable's breasts, but are there actually enough of those to justify the pool's existence? I'd actually vote for the removal of the Formidable pool over the creation of a Yuuka one. But you say you're the one who created the Formidable pool, so maybe you have some better idea of what that pool is supposed to be about, if not fat jokes (or fat tit jokes).
I'm pretty sure that was the point, they're both harmless kinks when kept to the realm of fiction by a functional adult, it's the nonfunctional people who go further who are the problem, yet the groups in question hold this double standard between them.
That's really not how their comment reads to me. It reads like they're saying that furry content should be criticized, and it's hypocritical that they criticize loli/shota but glorify furry.
But that point doesn't make any sense if both kinks are harmless. If furry is harmless, then why use it as an example of hypocrisy? It's not a double standard if there's nothing wrong with the kink.
That's really not how their comment reads to me. It reads like they're saying that furry content should be criticized, and it's hypocritical that they criticize loli/shota but glorify furry.
But that point doesn't make any sense if both kinks are harmless. If furry is harmless, then why use it as an example of hypocrisy? It's not a double standard if there's nothing wrong with the kink.
Maybe it was about the fact neither kids nor animals can give consent in real life? They may be conflating furries with zoophiles.
Wtf is this hot garbage, why a person who just for expample, wants to play a simple silly game or whatever shit is in appstore, compare to literal pedofiles, I know that you will say "achtualy is a drawing of a girl, not a literal girl", it is still by definition an attraction to minors, and what is it about society to demonize video games as if they were Hitler's machination to destroy minorities or something similar, jeez
Wtf is this hot garbage, why a person who just for expample, wants to play a simple silly game or whatever shit is in appstore, compare to literal pedofiles, I know that you will say "achtualy is a drawing of a girl, not a literal girl", it is still by definition an attraction to minors, and what is it about society to demonize video games as if they were Hitler's machination to destroy minorities or something similar, jeez
Just so you know, the artist regularly draws loli stuff. This is just a joke, not a hit piece.
It's also not still "by definition" an attraction to minors. I happen to be okay with loli, but the idea of doing anything with a real child makes me physically ill. Child abusers are scum, and I don't understand how anyone could be attracted to those noisy, snot filled gremlins.
I hate being a naysayers but I feel like something's off with this piece.
I 100% agree. The ribbons, the flowers, the neck band's knot/ribbon are all weirdly deformed and are not consistent at all, and her sarong has weird gaps and don't make sense. EDIT: I also colorpicked it, while not definitive proof, it goes nuts when you drag it across the white background.
A bit ashamed of this upload in hindsight, since the artist does really good pixelart I trusted this piece and didn't double check, maybe they've been using AI to assist on their work, but definitely an accidental upload on my side.
