Sources are not really relevant here, these are edits of the exact same scans. Exh probably isn't the only place this artbook was uploaded unaltered, just one of the more easily accessible ones. I would have approved these if they were matches with the original scans or at least pixel perfect duplicates. I don't care enough about tag sperging but you should really learn to use search options available to you to find proper scans.
Sources are not really relevant here, these are edits of the exact same scans. Exh probably isn't the only place this artbook was uploaded unaltered, just one of the more easily accessible ones. I would have approved these if they were matches with the original scans or at least pixel perfect duplicates. I don't care enough about tag sperging but you should really learn to use search options available to you to find proper scans.
My bad on this one. I was going through my backlog.
Whats the difference between e-hentai and exhentai? So far it seems like the latter allows loli content
If it really came from the same artbook as the one Hereinafter mentioned above, then it is most likely cropped because even if it's a different scan (though that doesn't seem likely), I doubt the scanner would be able to isolate the image during the actual scanning.
Looking at them side-by-side, it probably isn't downscaled, though I think that makes it more likely that it was cropped.
More importantly, you need to include your sources as I and others told you before (forum #433767). The filename does have the artbook it came from, but it doesn't tell us where you got it.
Edit: Hereinafter confirmed what I was thinking, but don't get the "sources are not really relevant here" part confused; you still need to provide a proper source.
If it really came from the same artbook as the one Hereinafter mentioned above, then it is most likely cropped because even if it's a different scan (though that doesn't seem likely), I doubt the scanner would be able to isolate the image during the actual scanning.
Looking at them side-by-side, it probably isn't downscaled, though I think that makes it more likely that it was cropped.
More importantly, you need to include your sources as I and others told you before (forum #433767). The filename does have the artbook it came from, but it doesn't tell us where you got it.
Edit: Hereinafter confirmed what I was thinking, but don't get the "sources are not really relevant here" part confused; you still need to provide a proper source.
Issue is when approvers see downscaled they immediately think of paint.net shitty downscales or whatever non-genuine source, so they press ignore, and my upload slots end up rotting for 3 days.
text in the background refers to Adam Lanza's usernames on social media platforms including forums and his interests
Kaynbred refers to his username on Wikipedia and High Road forum
Smiggles refers to his username on Super Columbine Massacre RPG Discussion forum
CulturalPhilistine refers to his username on Youtube
fuckcomments also refers to his username on Youtube
Travis refers to Travis the Chimp whom he made an analogy on AnarchyRadio
DDR refers to Dance Dance Revolution
pedophilia refers to him defending pedophilia
Lovebound refers to a screenplay he wrote a gay relationship between a 30-year old man and a 10-year old boy
antinatalism culture refers to him holding antinatalistic beliefs
dream refers to his dreams of being in mass shootings
anorexia refers to him being malnourished, vegan and anorexic and was 112 pounds at 6 ft at the time of death
Sandy Hook refers to his former elementary school that he shot up
the rest refers to his philosphy and beliefs
Adam wasn't defending pedophilia he was using pedophilia to deconstruct the framework of social and cultural structures, and the arbitrary nature of morality
Adam wasn't defending pedophilia he was using pedophilia to deconstruct the framework of social and cultural structures, and the arbitrary nature of morality
that might be why he said he believed there shouldn't be an age of consent, how his wet dream was to live in the wild with apes, and used Travis the Chimp as an analogy for himself that he was a victim of human civilization who only then acted out in violence from his environment because he wanted to be free from society's structures
that might be why he said he believed there shouldn't be an age of consent, how his wet dream was to live in the wild with apes, and used Travis the Chimp as an analogy for himself that he was a victim of human civilization who only then acted out in violence from his environment because he wanted to be free from society's structures
Adam referenced pedophilia in the sense that we have all been abused by the system, implying that when true connection exists, age should be irrelevant. He did not view the interaction between a child and an adult as inherently harmful; however, he noted that society immediately categorizes it as pedophilia and labels the minor as a victim of abuse. His core argument was that society uses these taboos to maintain a hierarchy of control, where the 'protection' of children is actually a form of ownership that strips them of their autonomy.
Adam referenced pedophilia in the sense that we have all been abused by the system, implying that when true connection exists, age should be irrelevant. He did not view the interaction between a child and an adult as inherently harmful; however, he noted that society immediately categorizes it as pedophilia and labels the minor as a victim of abuse. His core argument was that society uses these taboos to maintain a hierarchy of control, where the 'protection' of children is actually a form of ownership that strips them of their autonomy.
Adam had such interesting philosophy that I haven't seen from any other person, I'm impressed. Did it have any connection to the (debunked) theory that Adam committed the Sandy Hook school shooting to save children from future harm?
Adam had such interesting philosophy that I haven't seen from any other person, I'm impressed. Did it have any connection to the (debunked) theory that Adam committed the Sandy Hook school shooting to save children from future harm?
To start with the conclusion. I don't think he did it to save children from future harm
His motivation wasn't "saving." It was an extreme hatred of imposition itself. life, meaning, suffering all imposed prisons. He didn't kill to convey any kind of value. He did it because he had already completely detached from "relationships" and "value." Death, to him, wasn't liberation it was the end of value. And value was what he hated most in this life That theory you mentioned tries to give his actions some kind of "benevolent" motive but that directly contradicts his true nihilistic stance
Leave a comment