Loli/shota check thread.

post #838486 Is this and the other related pictures considered loli?
Also the above picture seems to had the loli tag removed by a member class user, I was under the impression only privileged and above are allowed to do that?

I think there's too much boobs for loli.

So it should be fine for the other pictures to be untagged as loli?

Most of them, yeah. post #838499 doesn't display any of her grown-up attributes, though, so it still might be eligible for tagging.

im not very knowledgable about the loli tag, what defines it and such. I tagged these images as loli to be safe but going through the artist's (natsu_no_koucha) work, i can't tell if these should be tagged loli or not. second opinion please?

post #891093
post #891095
post #891098

Looking pretty loli there, yeah.

post #891239

loli

post #891168

Nials said:
post #891168

Yes, loli.

post #790017
cameltoe, cutout near the crotch, but nothing showing.
Also, it looks like erect_nipples, but it's barely visible. Should I tag that?

The erect nipples are exceedingly minor, so no.

As for loli, I would say yes, but barely. I'll see what others have to say though.

Hillside_Moose said: As for loli, I would say yes, but barely. I'll see what others have to say though.

Hmm, that image is probably *not* the kind of thing I'd want to exclude when I add -loli to a search but I can't argue too strongly either way.

Nanashisan743 said:
post #790017
cameltoe, cutout near the crotch, but nothing showing.
Also, it looks like erect_nipples, but it's barely visible. Should I tag that?

though nothing is seen, it is clear the artist's intention was to show her body off without actually showing it.
id tag it as loli if nothing else, just for having a child drawn in a sexual way.

I wouldn't tag it child if it were safe (no cameltoe) because the eyes are drawn lower on children and the hips are wide enough. The setting is natural, all that's "sexual" about the image is that cameltoe. At least for me, that's not enough.

I'm with Hillside Moose and Zekana: loli, but only just over the line. There are hips, and there is less forehead than is often seen on depictions of children, but the whole composition screams underage. She's flat as a board, and the head to body size ratio is much larger than it should be even for a young teenager. That coupled with the overt (if not explicit) sexuality displayed with the defined nipples and cameltoe throws it over the border into loli for me.

The hips aren't prominent enough to thwart the tag, especially since that's just how Haga Yui draws her(?) lolis.
As for content, the cameltoe is a little too defined to overlook. The nipples, not so much; they're barely dots.

I'd go with keeping the tag.

post #895250

I'd say so. Tagging.

Not sure if post #895346 is loli I was thinking it was the style