Cyberia-Mix said:
post #792343
That's an interesting one. Breast development strongly says no but the proportions otherwise make that much less certain.
Posted under General
Cyberia-Mix said:
post #792343
That's an interesting one. Breast development strongly says no but the proportions otherwise make that much less certain.
I agree with sgcdonmai. Sometimes you need to make the judgement call without looking at the breasts of the character, but the rest of the body.
It isn't so rare for authors and artists to create characters with a child's body, but an adult's breasts. At least two characters come to mind that fit that description (not that our images on here might represent it), Usa Mimi and Ikaruga Kagome (elementary schoolers with well developed breasts).
post #291827
it was given the loli tag back in 08.
the quality of the art, along with the lack of detail makes me think it shouldn't have the loli tag, though with the positioning, I suppose questionable is in order.
your thoughts? not very sure how much the loli tag has changed over the years.
sgcdonmai said:
I'll vote yes on that one, because the breasts are basically the only part that doesn't make me lean towards that call.
Agree with that.
Zekana said:
post #291827
your thoughts? not very sure how much the loli tag has changed over the years.
(see post #36545 for my previous response on this)
That's still a cameltoe, and still an unpleasantly suggestive pose and situation, and Shikieiki still appears to have the proportions of a kid there.
Flagged back to the mod queue for quality checking.
Cyberia-Mix said:
post #621630
This one says "unnaturally slender", maybe "petite", rather than loli. The length of the torso and the proportions of the limbs don't suggest prepubescence.
sgcdonmai said:
This one says "unnaturally slender", maybe "petite", rather than loli. The length of the torso and the proportions of the limbs don't suggest prepubescence.
Also agree with that. Tagged it slender, as neither petite nor skinny would be accurate to me. Dunno if there's a better tag given that slender is barely used.
post #936855 (that's a huge head)
Cyberia-Mix said:
post #936855
Definitely loli.
I'm not quite sure if this should be tagged as loli :
On the one hand the artist draws mostly loli arts, but on the another one...she has some breasts in it.
Something about it just cant make a final decision
post #937681 - Yeah, close to the borderline, but I think it falls on the loli side of things, given what little of the overall proportions can be seen. Tagging.
post #869526 - Too close for me to really say. The overall proportions might be a yes.
Also, that misplaced thigh crease...
post #938918 - Loli, with a fair degree of certainty. Tagging.
post #939072 - Not loli; the overall body proportions (flat chest notwithstanding) are fully-grown.
Cruentus said:
post #931432
Yes. Tagged.
forgive me if this is not the proper thread, but i think it's quite related. loli and shota-tagged posts are not supposedly viewable to us, ordinary members right?
when i clicked a post tagged either loli or shota like those mentioned above, i get the message "You need a privileged account to see this image."
however, i can still view and see what it's like. i just scroll down and click the size link on the left side, down the Statistics panel. it's the hard link in the site repository. and also the source link if it's present. it will lead me to the outside source. just an observation.
Updated by ghostrigger
The reason they are banned from ad-based accounts is that advertisers don't like having their ads shown on pages with that sort of material. The source link therefore is no problem. The re-size link however might be worth looking into.
By in large though with a bit of ingenuity there are many legitimate ways to get at blocked images. The nature of the block isn't necessarily intended to make getting at them impossible however.