I'm not getting loli vibes. She's slender, but not childish, especially the legs.
Posted under General
I dunno... the face and body look loli to me, but the image itself doesn't seem all that sexual.
Then again, the images does seem to focus on the fact that she isn't wearing panties, even if only one part of the image really shows it.
Algasir said: post #868086
I'd say no.
I require a second opinion on post #874315
I don't think these are loli: parent:24807
jjj14 said:
I don't think these are loli: parent:24807
Age indeterminable, sexually explicit content zero. Removed from all three.
post #878368
low eyes and large forehead
barely questionable
S1eth said:
post #878368
shota, if anything, but it's not sexualized enough for that.
post #843112 - Condoms, and clearly a child, but no body parts showing and no sexual acts taking place.
Nials said:
post #878206
The angle plus the clothing makes this one basically impossible to judge.
jjj14 said:
post #843112
The condoms - especially the one in her mouth - do imply a great deal of sexualization, to me. Tagging it, for now.
post #880546 Tagged it and the 2 others after just in case but wanted to get a second opinion.
post #718905 Should probably be rated S and taged with child, or is a child nipple questionable and thus lolli?