post #10108423 loli, child, or neither?
Posted under General
post #10108423 loli, child, or neither?
Placeholder1996 said:
post #10108423 loli, child, or neither?
I wouldnt see that ass shot as provocative enough for loli. But same time owners said child tag shouldnt be used if it looks even remotely like sexualized framing. Maybe neither.
Freshblink said:
I wouldnt see that ass shot as provocative enough for loli. But same time owners said child tag shouldnt be used if it looks even remotely like sexualized framing. Maybe neither.
I thought neither would be best too; best to double-check though. Thanks
Updated by Placeholder1996
1. no
2. yes
Not sure where to report this, the topic is delicate as always.
There is a user #1339135 who maybe is too eager in their quest, but in my opinion it's borderline vandalism.
They tag the posts as "loli" despite multiple reversions from contributors and above. Being a normal user I guess they tag posts again as they see them "reappear".
Other examples I've found, just without screenshots.
SonMati69 said:
Not sure where to report this, the topic is delicate as always.
There is a user #1339135 who maybe is too eager in their quest, but in my opinion it's borderline vandalism.They tag the posts as "loli" despite multiple reversions from contributors and above. Being a normal user I guess they tag posts again as they see them "reappear".
Other examples I've found, just without screenshots.
I already dmed this guy to tell them off before, dont be afraid to neg them.
Edit warring wrong tags isn't borderline vandalism, it straight up is. If they've already been told what the correct way to use the tag is and intentionally defy that or don't bring posts up for discussion if they're confused on why a post is or isn't to be tagged that way, then that's a problem. It's just like people creating accounts just to change the way Bridget (Guilty Gear) is tagged against our current policy.
Somewhat leaning on loli. Not so sure with the angle, though.
WRS said:
Edit warring wrong tags isn't borderline vandalism, it straight up is. If they've already been told what the correct way to use the tag is and intentionally defy that or don't bring posts up for discussion if they're confused on why a post is or isn't to be tagged that way, then that's a problem. It's just like people creating accounts just to change the way Bridget (Guilty Gear) is tagged against our current policy.
To be honest, though, y'all remove loli from posts a 3ft tall no ass flat chested girls in microbikinis getting groped by dudes whose hands are bigger than the girl's torso with the justification that she looks like a teenager or that it's not a sexual image.
The most active users in this thread are often the ones who have the most restrictive criteria (how dare you suggest a loli can have mosquito bite nipples and that a playboy bunny out with highleg bottoms and lowcut neckline is lewd! You must be a puritan!) for both ratings and for what constitutes loli. While I agree that the user in question has made some mistakes, half the examples y'all bandy about as mistags would get you warned on the discord.
I've said it before, multiple times:
Veraducks said:
...y'all need to stop breakin' out the calipers and bubble levels to fight tooth and nail to say it's a very petite teen instead of a loli for whatever reason. And re-adjust what you see as lewd or not.
YabuH said:
yes
I have no stake in this discussion because I don't like this tag nor upload it. If there's a consensus or policy around a tag that gets frequently violated in an edit war, that's the problem. That's something between you people and the site staff to figure out. I don't know or care how these tags get used, I just left a generic comment.
WRS said:
user:hinalove is:nsfw -(loli or petite)
May someone go through this user's posts and check if they're not properly tagging for either loli or petite?
Requesting for this user again. Some posts like post #10130054 are not hitting my blacklist. Might need to just blacklist their uploader id or the character instead.
WRS said:
Requesting for this user again. Some posts like post #10130054 are not hitting my blacklist. Might need to just blacklist their uploader id or the character instead.
Almost loli, but not quite. However, I did find four others so far that are unquestionably loli and definitely should've been tagged from the beginning.
post #10133442 Is this loli?
ziin1234 said:
post #10133442 Is this loli?
No.
post #9993810
post #9723665
post #9618878
post #9425075
post #10121377
post #10112537
post #10111403
post #10025644
post #10025643
post #10025642
post #10025639
post #10025638
post #10025637
all of those look expired and not worthy the tag, i strongly believe