what about these, they look young-ish at least
Posted under General
what about these, they look young-ish at least
Arcaeca said:
what about these, they look young-ish at least
I’d say no.
Freshblink said:
Does this need the tag?
Borderline, but I think not.
Placeholder1996 said:
Not prepubescent.
not even sexual I think, removed it
post #1746738 and post #7045415 currently have the shota tag. From the wiki and from what I see in this thread, it seems like that should be removed. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
fgbooru said:
post #1746738 and post #7045415 currently have the shota tag. From the wiki and from what I see in this thread, it seems like that should be removed. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Not sure about the second one, but I think the first one still counts.
Bernkastel83 said:
Nope. She's too curvy to qualify in my opinion.
Need to check for this user's post changes again.
Updated by asgembed . js
Placeholder1996 said:
I don’t think these are lolis.
post #9940581 shota?
fgbooru said:
post #1746738 and post #7045415 currently have the shota tag. From the wiki and from what I see in this thread, it seems like that should be removed. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Second one looks like a young man but not a shota to me. Unsure about the first one.
aster1a said:
post #9940581 shota?
i lean yes; not certain though