Posted under General
ルーミア said:
I dunno what you think virtual YouTuber is for but it's just a blanket tag for characters that people use as YouTube/stream avatars, not a specific body type. As for the loli, like I said, loli only applies to sexual images, but I'd probably just tag that image with petite anyway.
Nah, I would tag it with child, not petite.
jay19 said:
Underwear on an adult looking character sure. On a child looking character probably should be questionable.
But... I'm guessing this character is suppose to be an adult? Since Loli was taken off and child not added?
Anyway it's been brought here with people who have more experience with tagging for this site. It's approved, already. If no one has any issues. I'll have to add virtual YouTuber to my searches in the future.
Rating refers to how sexually explicit an image is. Perfectly normal underwear is not inherently sexual, no matter who it's on. The character isn't doing anything sexual, there's nothing exposed, no cameltoe. Even if I did think it should be tagged child, I don't think I would mark it questionable.
There are way to many child rating Q, even when you filter the child + risque adult stuff.
@ルーミア said:
Yes
Sort of need a second opinion.
post #4381049 and its children
Looks like a flat-chested young woman to me.
post #55015 is loli, its censored parent is not. Which one is correct?
ion288 said:
post #55015 is loli, its censored parent is not. Which one is correct?
nonamethanks said:
I don't think it's loli.
Uncensored sibling also lacks loli tag. I'd second not loli.
post #177177.
One of these interesting examples where if it is a childs body it should be Q and loli but if it isnt it could be S.
