Posted under General
how about post #4667057
post #4682649 is this a loli?
leotard2020 said:
post #4682649 is this a loli?
Yes.
zaregoto said:
Nah.
post #4692753 and children
Are those really loli/shota/child on child? It just looks like teenagers to me.
nonamethanks said:
post #4692753 and children
Are those really loli/shota/child on child? It just looks like teenagers to me.
They don't look like loli or shota to me.
Are post #3887180 or post #3877795 loli? Someone mass added the tag to a lot of that artist's posts and I'm finding several changes doubtful.
nonamethanks said:
Are post #3887180 or post #3877795 loli? Someone mass added the tag to a lot of that artist's posts and I'm finding several changes doubtful.
By sadpanda standards probably but by ours I'd say no.
nonamethanks said:
Are post #3887180 or post #3877795 loli? Someone mass added the tag to a lot of that artist's posts and I'm finding several changes doubtful.
First one no, second one yes imo
nonamethanks said:
Are post #3887180 or post #3877795 loli? Someone mass added the tag to a lot of that artist's posts and I'm finding several changes doubtful.
I second shade 30's opinions on this one.
post #4700464 I don't think this is loli but wanted a second opinion before removing the tag.
blindVigil said:
post #4700464 I don't think this is loli but wanted a second opinion before removing the tag.
Not loli imo.
post #3635811 I don't remember our policy on this, does Nanako's presence necessitate loli here?
blindVigil said:
post #3635811 I don't remember our policy on this, does Nanako's presence necessitate loli here?
I think no, see forum #188278 for a similar case.
Leaning towards not loli but I want a second opinion.
I would tag this as loli but it would possibly hinder translation efforts, not to mention the subject in question is not the focus of the comic. Should I?
Updated by tapnek
