Loli/shota check thread.

Posted under General

Alex MKW

VSD02C said:

This was weird.

post #4218362

As soon as I uploaded this one, it tells me I need a gold account to view it. Most likely because I tagged it as loli, as did the artist, but.... There's a shitload of sakuna-hime art that *isn't* tagged as such, so can a mod or something take a look at this and decide? And if not, can it be made viewable?

Loli is only really valid for questionable and explicit/nsfw sexual content. This post in question isn't loli, and just because the pixiv tags include loli, doesn't mean it should always be tagged as such here.

Reply
Reanpav osmisey

post #4251256

Specifically the parent, which I uploaded- I really don't think it qualifies as loli, especially she's even more developed looking than her regular depictions in terms of body type. This one is particularly nonsensical because not only is this child post being left untagged as loli despite being even more explicit, but it got rejected to begin with (with the parent being approved with little issue), and then reapproved after an appeal. And yet despite that, the parent was still left tagged as loli.

Reply
Unbreakable

Reanpav_osmisey said:

post #4251256

Specifically the parent, which I uploaded- I really don't think it qualifies as loli, especially she's even more developed looking than her regular depictions in terms of body type. This one is particularly nonsensical because not only is this child post being left untagged as loli despite being even more explicit, but it got rejected to begin with (with the parent being approved with little issue), and then reapproved after an appeal. And yet despite that, the parent was still left tagged as loli.

Yeah that's not loli, one of the images was even tagged with child which is even more wrong, removed the tags.

Reply
1 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 267