blindVigil said:
Would like second opinions on this user's additions of the loli tag.
Cleared the erroneous explicit posts.
Posted under General
post #4019297 and its children?
should post #4022113 be tagged as loli, or is it ok?
ajkeene99 said:
should post #4022113 be tagged as loli, or is it ok?
It doesn't look very loli to me.
Veradux said:
post #4019297 and its children?
I'm on the fence on this one, so probably not. Maybe just petite
post #1769313 and child?
post #3420233 has got to be loli right? Edit: I'm just going to add it.
Updated by parzlar
post #4028852? It's kind of borderline I think but I'm not sure. It was approved but that was after I tagged it as such myself.
Is post #4002325 considered loli?
VR-Man said:
Is post #4002325 considered loli?
I'd say yes.
ion288 said:
post #1769313 and child?
Just petite.
ajkeene99 said:
post #4028852? It's kind of borderline I think but I'm not sure. It was approved but that was after I tagged it as such myself.
tbh I wouldn't tag that as loli, it seems like a normal young anime woman with small breasts to me. The typical body proportions of a child aren't there.
Is post #4046285 (and by extension, its child) loli? The hips seem too wide to me.
AngryZapdos said:
Is post #4046285 (and by extension, its child) loli? The hips seem too wide to me.
Agreed.
post #4049324 - has been tagged as loli. It's my own character so I know she's not, she's petite... But just to be sure, can someone with gold+ check if it counts as loli or possibly fix if not?
Should the recent posts in lynn loli be in toddlercon? Because they look about as young to me as most of the stuff in that tag (which, unlike "loli" is one that I have blacklisted).
166417 said:
I'd say no.
Seems to be in some dispute based on its tag history.
Is post #4076583 (and its child, post #4073051) considered shota?
Updated by VR-Man
Mithiwithi said:
Seems to be in some dispute based on its tag history.
I would say no, though it is close.
VR-Man said:
Is post #4076583 (and its child, post #4073051) considered shota?
Yes, even if the kid is fully dressed it is involved in a sexual act.