Loli/shota check thread.

Gachi-go said:

Yes hello (I usually don't intend to ask but curious) but was one of my post reconsidered for the gold deal? My (5) pending posts are the following:

Office Raikou, Pixiv variant of a Melone post, a Fillia full body and a Maid Raikou.

(For reference: post #3960174 post #3961183 post #3961184 post #3962743 )

While yes I'm aware these are full grown women I'm mostly confused at the fifth one, nor do I remember what it was and I think it was possibly mistagged.

post #3959732 was tagged as shota.

nonamethanks said:

post #3959732 was tagged as shota.

....I thought the dude was sitting.....on a chair....that....wut....wut....

*insert Jackie Chan surprised meme*

Thank you for clarification

Is post #3973287 can be considered shota?

VR-Man said:

Is post #3973287 can be considered shota?

Yes.

post #259275, post #268093, post #363170, post #1365088

Which of these do you think is childlike enough to be considered "loli"?

arisboch said:

post #259275, post #268093, post #363170, post #1365088

Which of these do you think is childlike enough to be considered "loli"?

1 and 2 definitely
3 leaning no, hips look a little too wide
4 definitely not

post #3904906, post #3976737 and their child posts
Does they really count as shota?

lamialover97 said:

post #3904906, post #3976737 and their child posts
Does they really count as shota?

No. The uploader maybe just used the translated tags, but this isn´t a shota IMO.

post #3970158 Not loli, not even explicit.

Tomzai said:

post #3970158 Not loli, not even explicit.

Looks very suggestive and proportions say loli.

post #3970158 Not loli, not even explicit.

It doesnt have to be explicit for loli, only questionable.
I dont think those hips are loli, though it could qualify as bad anatomy.

I agree with ion, those hips are way too wide for me to call it loli but it's totally questionable.

post #3988926 I uploaded was tagged loli, but post #3943025 by the same artist is not. Both are tagged loli on pixiv. #3943025 has been here for at least a month without change, and both are more or less similar, so I don't know what prompted #3988926 to be tagged as such.

Side note, the tag "white background" for #3988926 was deleted and replaced with "ite_background" for some reason so someone should change that.

post #3877935 is this post really loli?

Tomzai said:

post #3877935 is this post really loli?

I don´t think so

Tomzai said:

post #3877935 is this post really loli?

I’d say no. The user who tagged it as such has a pretty poor loli tag usage track record. Maybe someone should check the other tag changes that haven’t been reverted yet.

post #4002472
post #4002855

Are those can be considered shota?

VR-Man said:

post #4002472
post #4002855

Are those can be considered shota?

yes imo

post #4008182
Leaning towards no, but unsure.

Would like second opinions on this user's additions of the loli tag.