AI-generated art check thread

anonbl said:

There are no recordings of the beginning of the process here. I can’t imagine how anyone could draw something from Kiseijuu because of the error. It might be at least AI-assisted.

But I can't imagine them zooming in to the hand in front of all the audiences like in the beginning of this stream if they weren't confident about it being genuine human work.

The hand actually looked less weird in the Day 1 stream: asset #34957805. I think the artist made it worse in the later rendering.

Noticed that some arts from isakaakasimk34 have been listed as AI-generated, are they really? post #10095789 doesn't really look anything like AI to me personally, but it might be

TheGamingRodent said:

Noticed that some arts from isakaakasimk34 have been listed as AI-generated, are they really? post #10095789 doesn't really look anything like AI to me personally, but it might be

Unfortunately they are. For post #10095789 look at the flowers and the cardigan buttons. post #10095790 the hair form loops in unreasonable ways.

8253803 said:

Unfortunately they are. For post #10095789 look at the flowers and the cardigan buttons. post #10095790 the hair form loops in unreasonable ways.

Dang and the art looked so good to, such a shame (should've stopped when I upped the first art of them honestly, who know they were an AI artist)

Considering how every post of buronjin is marked as ai-assisted or ai-generated and deleted, I would assume this one is as well, but aside from "vibes" I can't pin anything on this

artist #582222

Maybe it's just me (and sorry for just going with "vibes"), but this artist looks sus.

VR-Man said:

artist #582222

Maybe it's just me (and sorry for just going with "vibes"), but this artist looks sus.

it does have AI vibes from the look and shading, but I still need more opinion before putting the AI tags

VR-Man said:

artist #582222

Maybe it's just me (and sorry for just going with "vibes"), but this artist looks sus.

post #10225318 at the very least, there's AI artifacts on the chibi when you zoom in... the part where her hair is tucked behind her ear and drapes on her shoulder seems melty (along with all the hair framing her face

(NSFW) pixiv #136327017 and pixiv #136359840 have issues on the bikini straps/metal parts, NIKKE girl's jacket zipper looks weird and Robin's halo does too

VR-Man said:

artist #582222

Maybe it's just me (and sorry for just going with "vibes"), but this artist looks sus.

post #10225318: the melty sleeve cuffs and hair-collar mixing
post #10225388: the sleeve openings make no sense geometrically, and the hair is not continuous above and below the pocky she's eating.

artist #335476
Are this artist latest images AI?

Torrearcilla said:

artist #335476
Are this artist latest images AI?

No. You can see the boundaries of brushstrokes and the blending of transparent layers e.g. asset #35167785

post #10207513

An artifact on the tail and maybe the hair. Flag without tag. What's the verdict?

ion288 said:

post #10207513

An artifact on the tail and maybe the hair. Flag without tag. What's the verdict?

It's not artefact. Amateurish human work.

was gonna upload a work i got off @Namenium on twitter but saw that they're apparently an ai artist according to danbooru
my vision didn't find like, even a single spot that i could call suspicious in any of their works that i'm aware of and i haven't really found any sources for such myself
just wanted to double check, apologies or thanks in advance

made a thread about namenium (topic #33804) earlier before i knew about this thread and thought i would bring that here, still a bit weird in my mind

baroque333 said:

made a thread about namenium (topic #33804) earlier before i knew about this thread and thought i would bring that here, still a bit weird in my mind

For example post #10055734 there's a weird ear, post #9715809 at every cross on the pantyhose there is some AI smudge, post #9708499 the jacket is impossibly ending up behind her

post #10233899

Maybe it's just me; but the wrong eye colour (it's not a cosplay), whatever it is on her left arm (not the skull "print"), and the zipper made me think twice before approving.

VR-Man said:

post #10233899

Maybe it's just me; but the wrong eye colour (it's not a cosplay), whatever it is on her left arm (not the skull "print"), and the zipper made me think twice before approving.

maybe AI-assisted? artist's twitter has images going back to 2022 that aren't terrible, but there was a small shift in style in 2023. some sketches/uncolored and short animations but no making-of as far as I can see https://twitter.com/Gtxanimator

post #10217139
post #7092170

Do these have an ai-generated_background? Work by futaba_(anti_clockwise) seems to have either that or a simple background.

sun-dried_tomato said:

post #10217139
post #7092170

Do these have an ai-generated_background? Work by futaba_(anti_clockwise) seems to have either that or a simple background.

These simple patterns can be made without AI.

post #9120105
Not inclined to reapprove it but a verdict would be useful.