Someone should probably double check xionxxxxion's art. They have rebranded entirely into an AI twitter and Pixiv, but it's verifiably the same person via the twitter intent links
Posted under General
Someone should probably double check xionxxxxion's art. They have rebranded entirely into an AI twitter and Pixiv, but it's verifiably the same person via the twitter intent links
zetsubousensei said:
Someone should probably double check xionxxxxion's art. They have rebranded entirely into an AI twitter and Pixiv, but it's verifiably the same person via the twitter intent links
I think the art already posted here is fine. I don't see any artifacts and there's quite a bit of detail. This eye for example, from post #9847468: asset #34611438.
Updated by Placeholder1996
Most of it looked fine, but then I noticed that is looks like some hair is growing underneath her right-boob on the left side of the image, and especially around the closest-shoulder on the right-side of the image are some of the "fuzzy edges" common on AI.
Updated by FWP
FWP said:
Most of it looked fine, but then I noticed that is looks like some hair is growing underneath her right-boob on the left side of the image, and especially around the closest-shoulder on the right-side of the image are some of the "fuzzy edges" common on AI.
I don't think this is AI. There are a lot of brush strokes in the hair, and there are no artifacts in the usual places like the eyes or eyelashes. I think the blurry part you pointed out is the end of a lock of hair they drew to the right of the face; it looks that way because of their less precise style. As for the hair under the breast, I don't know why that's there, but I don't think it's because of generation.
Could someone flag the rest of artist #577432's posts? Someone tagged post #10134164 with ai-generated and I confirmed it; there were artifacts in the hair and eyes. I'm out of flags. Warning: shota, rating:E Flagged. Thanks to whoever did it.
Updated by Placeholder1996
pretty sure post #10207513 may be heavily ai-assisted the artists other deleted entries were deleted for being gnereated and their pixiv is entirely using ai to some heavy degree
Updated by ion288
ion288 said:
Could someone not Twitter impaired verify these flags?
The flags are correct. Their Twitter states they use AI.
Weird question since it's actually an official art, but post #10210985 is heavily accused being AI generated as pointed out by twitter users in the reply.
https://x.com/hasunosora_SIC/status/1984249756953268314
siraco said:
Weird question since it's actually an official art, but post #10210985 is heavily accused being AI generated as pointed out by twitter users in the reply.
https://x.com/hasunosora_SIC/status/1984249756953268314
It might be. I am seeing a few suspicious areas. The most obvious to me is Osawa Rurino's hair ornament. It looks nothing like the ornament in post #10098769, for example. There are also some melting lines on the front-most girl's left hand (our perspective, asset #34854135) and the left-most girl's right shoe (asset #34854136); Hinoshita Kaho's bangs also look suspicious. That said, there aren't melting lines all over the place, so I think this may be ai-assisted with incomplete/ineffective touch ups. I am a bit tempted to flag it, but I can't for another day or so.
Updated by Placeholder1996
Placeholder1996 said:
It might be. I am seeing a few suspicious areas. The most obvious to me is Osawa Rurino's hair ornament. It looks nothing like the ornament in post #10098769, for example.
It's a different perspective, it's not going to look similar.
There are also some melting lines on the front-most girl's left hand (our perspective, asset #34854135) and the left-most girl's right shoe (asset #34854136);
These seem really flimsy.
Hinoshita Kaho's bangs also look suspicious.
These do look a bit different from their usual design, but nothing that can't be explained by a specific artstyle. The same goes for the fact that they seem a bit "clumpy", so to say.
That said, there aren't melting lines all over the place, so I think this may be ai-assisted with incomplete/ineffective touch ups. I am a bit tempted to flag it, but I can't for another day or so.
Please don't flag posts because you think it might be assisted. You should at least be relatively sure there's a rulebreaking amount of AI use, and this obviously does not meet that standard. Approvers looking at it can't magically determine whether there was AI used, so the conversation is just going to end up here or in the post's comments anyway. Flagging before a good determination has been made is just wasting people's time.
ANON_TOKYO said:
Please don't flag posts because you think it might be assisted. You should at least be relatively sure there's a rulebreaking amount of AI use, and this obviously does not meet that standard. Approvers looking at it can't magically determine whether there was AI used, so the conversation is just going to end up here or in the post's comments anyway. Flagging before a good determination has been made is just wasting people's time.
Fair, I was too loose with my wording there, I apologize.
post #10213988
Someone tagged this, can I get a second opinion? maybe ai-assisted?
Need a second opinion on this one. Also not sure if this account is the original artist or a commissioner account.
Can I get a second opinion on evil otakuhunters please? The bandage coming off the neck in post #10216211 looks fused into the hair. 768x1152 is a resolution common to AI generation, with post #10216200 and post #10206691 being upscaled from that (768x1152 x 2 = 1536x2304). Plus post #10206691 has weird gibberish candy, a weird gibberish collar, blush lines which don't connect through the strands of hair falling across the face, inconsistent clothing seams for the left and right shoulders, and uneven eyelashes.
Moetsukita again.
Context:
They have started publishing PSDs on Patreon. I have examined them and discussed with some builders on Discord. We think these PSDs are human-drawn, or at least there is no evidence suggesting otherwise.
Personally I recommend stop tagging their posts with ai-assisted starting from post #10092599.
Updated by 8253803
post #10213296
The hand
anonbl said:
post #10213296
The hand
Do not attribute to AI that which is adequately explained by artistic error. The artist streams just started streaming their work on Twitch, so I highly doubt it anyhow.
feldt said:
Can I get a second opinion on evil otakuhunters please?
that Arlecchino is (imo) the most obvious, look at the frilled wrist cuffs on the viewer's right and the random lines in the middle of her chest
hasu_no_tokimeki said:
Do not attribute to AI that which is adequately explained by artistic error. The artist
streamsjust started streaming their work on Twitch, so I highly doubt it anyhow.
There are no recordings of the beginning of the process here. I can’t imagine how anyone could draw something from Kiseijuu because of the error. It might be at least AI-assisted.
Updated by anonbl