AI-generated art check thread

width:832 height:1216
width:832 height:1216 date:<2023-11-01
width:832 height:1216 date:>2023-11-01

Probably everything with resolution 832x1216 is ai-generated or at least ai-assisted. This is one of the resolutions used by NovelAI v3 and it was almost never used by artists before NovelAI v3 came out in November 2023. Before that date there were only 6 posts with that resolution on Danbooru, but after that date it suddenly skyrocketed to over 1200 posts. 75% of these were tagged as AI, which means 25% went undetected.

Posts with 832x1216 resolution from 2005 to 2025

evazion said:

...

While it'll obviously depend on the artist, I can imagine using an AI image (even unknowingly) as a base reference for something, thus unknowingly setting the image canvas to this size. I don't doubt there's a bunch of untagged AI with this resolution, but I can imagine there's a few of those accidental cases too.

-

moebits said:

artist #404296

Looks like an AI artist to me.

I see no signs of AI generation in their art.

-

moebits said:

A lot of their posts have the same height (3584px) which is a bit sus.references.

Irrelevant, using a consistent canvas size is not grounds for suspicion.

And post #10141333 has a weird right hand (index, middle, and ring fingers the same length).

That does look slightly weird, but on its own can also just be a normal human mistake.

None of it is tagged as such, so it's basically impossible to tell. at least to me it looks like the artist is using some AI assistance or AI

Well we're in this thread to figure that out. If you have any additional indicators please do share them, but "vibes" alone don't cut it.

moebits said:

A lot of their posts have the same height (3584px) which is a bit sus. And post #10141333 has a weird right hand (index, middle, and ring fingers the same length).

None of it is tagged as such, so it's basically impossible to tell. at least to me it looks like the artist is using some AI assistance or AI references.

Look at how detailed the eyelashes and eyes are on post #10070037 or the bra on post #8824150. You don't see detail like that on AI "art" because the lines are almost always screwed up somehow, especially with eyes, eyelashes, and bangs. There's no evidence of that here. And even if it is AI-referenced or AI-assisted, it would still be acceptable by the site's standards.

Hello, i found for what it looks a great art, but nowadays im not sure if its ai or not
https://x.com/YMYangming/status/1980932334259192178?t=Xh11hSPppFvOuSsF7JYjow&s=19

melon00 said:

Hello, i found for what it looks a great art, but nowadays im not sure if its ai or not
https://x.com/YMYangming/status/1980932334259192178?t=Xh11hSPppFvOuSsF7JYjow&s=19

I don't see any ai artifacts, and it looks human-drawn. I think it's unlikely to be ai-generated.

Placeholder1996 said:

I don't see any ai artifacts, and it looks human-drawn. I think it's unlikely to be ai-generated.

Thank you for the help.

VR-Man said:
Want to confirm if post #10128329 and post #10124811 are actually ai-assisted and whether they're fine to keep or not.

Late reply and they're already flagged, but I'm not a fan of the buckle on post #10128329 or the way the eyelashes meld with the mask on post #10124811. I agree with the flagger.

I have a hunch clfmsh99 is crudely tracing generated images in the style of wagashi (dagashiya). They follow many AI creators on Pixiv and they're willingly posted AI-generated videos of their own. https://x.com/reccete/status/1975540699031617977

I'm pretty sure post #8702397 is AI generated based on the artist's Twitter bio and their Twitter posts.

post #10161064

The pixiv account looks sus, and so is this particular post.

artist #408627

I remember this guy's early works looked very AI-ish (and were deleted from Pixiv).
Wonder if he's still using AI or not.

Retardant_II said:

I'm pretty sure post #8702397 is AI generated based on the artist's Twitter bio and their Twitter posts.

agreed; his glasses melt into his forehead.

VR-Man said:

post #10161064

The pixiv account looks sus, and so is this particular post.

There are artifacts all over the place. The thighhighs, the bows on the garter straps, the fingernails, the hair ornament, probably more.

post #10164063

lots of going on on this images, the messy hair and hand, need more opinion on this

post #10159832

Artist wasn't active till December 2022, and has posted a lot on Pixiv in that intervening time. Can't tell if I'm just being paranoid or not tho.

Massonia said:

post #10164063

lots of going on on this images, the messy hair and hand, need more opinion on this

Looking at their other posts on Pixiv, I think this is messily drawn rather than AI. I'm not certain though.

Knowledge_Seeker said:

post #10159832

Artist wasn't active till December 2022, and has posted a lot on Pixiv in that intervening time. Can't tell if I'm just being paranoid or not tho.

I'm confident this is AI. There are clear artifacts on pixiv #125167440 and pixiv #113793501. On the first example, the buttons on her open shirt are messed up; on the second, it looks like the generator got confused between drawing the plant and a hand. I have flagged it as such.