AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

width:832 height:1216
width:832 height:1216 date:<2023-11-01
width:832 height:1216 date:>2023-11-01

Probably everything with resolution 832x1216 is ai-generated or at least ai-assisted. This is one of the resolutions used by NovelAI v3 and it was almost never used by artists before NovelAI v3 came out in November 2023. Before that date there were only 6 posts with that resolution on Danbooru, but after that date it suddenly skyrocketed to over 1200 posts. 75% of these were tagged as AI, which means 25% went undetected.

evazion said:

...

While it'll obviously depend on the artist, I can imagine using an AI image (even unknowingly) as a base reference for something, thus unknowingly setting the image canvas to this size. I don't doubt there's a bunch of untagged AI with this resolution, but I can imagine there's a few of those accidental cases too.

moebits said:

A lot of their posts have the same height (3584px) which is a bit sus.references.

Irrelevant, using a consistent canvas size is not grounds for suspicion.

And post #10141333 has a weird right hand (index, middle, and ring fingers the same length).

That does look slightly weird, but on its own can also just be a normal human mistake.

None of it is tagged as such, so it's basically impossible to tell. at least to me it looks like the artist is using some AI assistance or AI

Well we're in this thread to figure that out. If you have any additional indicators please do share them, but "vibes" alone don't cut it.

moebits said:

A lot of their posts have the same height (3584px) which is a bit sus. And post #10141333 has a weird right hand (index, middle, and ring fingers the same length).

None of it is tagged as such, so it's basically impossible to tell. at least to me it looks like the artist is using some AI assistance or AI references.

Look at how detailed the eyelashes and eyes are on post #10070037 or the bra on post #8824150. You don't see detail like that on AI "art" because the lines are almost always screwed up somehow, especially with eyes, eyelashes, and bangs. There's no evidence of that here. And even if it is AI-referenced or AI-assisted, it would still be acceptable by the site's standards.

Massonia said:

post #10164063

lots of going on on this images, the messy hair and hand, need more opinion on this

Looking at their other posts on Pixiv, I think this is messily drawn rather than AI. I'm not certain though.

Knowledge_Seeker said:

post #10159832

Artist wasn't active till December 2022, and has posted a lot on Pixiv in that intervening time. Can't tell if I'm just being paranoid or not tho.

I'm confident this is AI. There are clear artifacts on pixiv #125167440 and pixiv #113793501. On the first example, the buttons on her open shirt are messed up; on the second, it looks like the generator got confused between drawing the plant and a hand. I have flagged it as such.