I know I shouldn't ask on vibes but the various bows and ornaments on post #10043592 feels sus.
Posted under General
I know I shouldn't ask on vibes but the various bows and ornaments on post #10043592 feels sus.
Someone added the ai-generated tag to this post. Need a double check just to be sure.
This is obvious an AI prompter.
pixiv #131705807: AI artifacts at eyes_visible_through_hair part and hair ornament.
Updated by asgembed . js
VR-Man said:
Someone added the ai-generated tag to this post. Need a double check just to be sure.
It already got flagged, but yes this is obvious AI
asgembed_._js said:
This is obvious an AI prompter.
For example:
pixiv #131705807: AI artifacts at eyes_visible_through_hair part and hair ornament.
Agreed. I added a "do not upload" note to their artist page.
Just want to check. They said in one of their tweets before this that they reworked their header with the help of AI.
MaskedAvenger said:
Just want to check. They said in one of their tweets before this that they reworked their header with the help of AI.
There may be some ai artifacts, but it's hard to be certain because of the low resolution. There's a line on the right sleeve that looks like it wants to be another seam, and the right eyebrow looks like an AI line. (left/right from our perspective)
Placeholder1996 said:
The most likely reason is inconsistent tagging. Some users are less thorough than others, some may not care or know that the art is ai-assisted, or sometimes they may simply forget to add the tag.
That makes sense.
I just see them post stuff like this on Twitter - https://twitter.com/Redpostit101/status/1968995598431928760 - and it confuses me.
I feel like this artist has been wrongfully tagged as ai-generated. If anything it's considered ai-assisted but there's also no indication of this as none of the posts on pixiv or artstation are tagged ai. I'm unsure how to "un-flag" an entire artist, or just go post by post changing the tags manually.
Looking for direction on this, thank you.
Nevermind, after further inspection of some of the older posts, they look like ai. But I would still like to know if it should be considered ai-generated or ai-assisted since there are little to no errors.
Updated by Shinymokuba
Shinymokuba said:
I feel like this artist has been wrongfully tagged as ai-generated. If anything it's considered ai-assisted but there's also no indication of this as none of the posts on pixiv or artstation are tagged ai. I'm unsure how to "un-flag" an entire artist, or just go post by post changing the tags manually.
Looking for direction on this, thank you.
The melty hair in post #9019011, missing right arm in post #9819601, the left hand in post #8828212, and generally odd compositions suggest to me their images are more ai-generated than not
Shinymokuba said:
artist #463515
[...]
I agree with what was said already; I see a number of artifacts in their posts. Their artist page also has a note about them being a prompter.
ion288 said:
I know I shouldn't ask on vibes but the various bows and ornaments on post #10043592 feels sus.
unlikely to be ai. too much stuff in the foreground/background. also ai struggles with objects that are supposed to be perfectly symmetrical. and i don't think ai can gen that goldfish. there's also some effect on the lineart which is probably impossible to do with ai.
PuckForts said:
The melty hair in post #9019011, missing right arm in post #9819601, the left hand in post #8828212, and generally odd compositions suggest to me their images are more ai-generated than not
Ok thanks for the help.
Is this AI?
FemboyWoody said:
Is this AI?
It looks human to me; I can't spot any obvious artifacts and the neck bell looks detailed.
FemboyWoody said:
Is this AI?
Does not look like AI-Generated for me. There are a lot of details that can't be done with AI.
Are post #7659636 and post #7534374 AI-assisted? Former seems to have some kind of weird tangerine/egg hybrid, latter has very strange wooden flooring and a suspicious background. Having a hard time finding other stand-out examples of weird background from their work though; they use a lot of blurring as depth of field and their recent art doesn't have backgrounds.
I saw someone accuse the making-of asset #33340499 for post #9183750 actually being a tracing (of AI art). I'm not knowledgeable enough about drawing to say for sure, but it definitely does NOT look like a normal making-of to me.