NilesHayter said:
Something about this artist's art feels like it was generated, but I haven't been able to confirm it myself with the artist in question:
artist #293705
I don’t see anything overt.
Posted under General
NilesHayter said:
Something about this artist's art feels like it was generated, but I haven't been able to confirm it myself with the artist in question:
artist #293705
I don’t see anything overt.
Of note: has a CivitAI profile and this in their Twitter description:
I use neural networks to assist in my creative process. All of my works are free to view. Hope you enjoy them.
Just started seeing them crop up recently without being tagged as AI-assisted or AI-generated (I've done AI-assisted for now as the bare minimum). Some look good enough that we can excuse them (e.g. post #9277905) but I'm curious about the others.
WRS said:
Of note: has a CivitAI profile and this in their Twitter description:
Just started seeing them crop up recently without being tagged as AI-assisted or AI-generated (I've done AI-assisted for now as the bare minimum). Some look good enough that we can excuse them (e.g. post #9277905) but I'm curious about the others.
They’re minute, but I did spot some signs of AI generation in a few of their posts.
I think there might be artifacts in the other posts too, but they’re harder to identify because either the image is blurry in those locations or the resolution of the image is too low to tell with certainty.
Appealer removed the AI tag. Was that right?
Having doubts after looking at their other posts on Twitter.
ion288 said:
Appealer removed the AI tag. Was that right?
I don’t see any obvious artifacts; maybe ai-assisted? Has there been any previous discussion about this artist?
Placeholder1996 said:
I don’t see any obvious artifacts; maybe ai-assisted? Has there been any previous discussion about this artist?
In forum #348349 and the reply below. so not much
MaskedAvenger said:
Having doubts after looking at their other posts on Twitter.
I’m not sure to be honest; there might be artifacts on the buttons, but that’s such a small detail it’s hard to be sure. It looks like an AI style, but that’s not a good enough reason on its own. I’ll look at their other twitter posts later; not really in a position to do that at the moment.
aster1a said:
In forum #348349 and the reply below. so not much
And the link in the reply leads to a deleted post. Figures.
mashiro_www seems to be hand drawn/ai-referenced then upscaled? Not sure what to make of it
https://x.com/mashiro_www/status/1969530891308281999
https://x.com/mashiro_www/status/1969531210205384970
What do you think about this? It doesn't look like AI, and the author's works is already on the site, but it really bothers me that the ears and hair are going through the hat.
Is it more than ai-generated background?
Popkornikus said:
What do you think about this? It doesn't look like AI, and the author's works is already on the site, but it really bothers me that the ears and hair are going through the hat.
I don't see anything AI about it either, but going by this account's bio and each image being a different art style, this seems to be a commissioner account. The artist of this one is credited as "taitai" in the description. Maybe someone who speaks Chinese can double-check.
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/4523295 New to danbooru; I can't tell if they're posting AI or not. Some of their posts feel like AI (espicially pixiv #135320986 and pixiv #135137459), but I can't find any conclusive proof either.
Also having doubts.
Might want to check if it was a user-added tag if the only point of suspect is that there's an AI tag, especially if it's something like this where only a single work or so are tagged with it. Some people engage in some serious bullshittery on Pixiv, even some Danbooru users/lurkers, adding AI tags to justify flagging or tagging here. It's ridiculous. Once in a blue moon you'll see a post get flagged with "tagged with AI on Pixiv" and it's blatantly human drawn. See post #8349064 for reference.