Posted under General
ion288 said:
post #9120105
Not inclined to reapprove it but a verdict would be useful.
No, I don't think so. Small details like the lines of the eyes, the chains on her necklace, the way the blur was applied, tips of the hair, it doesn't look like AI to me.
I'm fairly certain some of the child posts of post #5869460 and possibly the parent itself are AI-assisted.
There are some weird details and blur between the pictures, but I cant confidently tag them as such without a second opinion.
The artist openly uses AI and repost of post #3700570 on pixiv has clearly AI-edited variants so this wouldnt be unheard of from the artist.
Is this AI generated or Honkibooty's alt account?
Their time between image uploads on twitter is short but there's no patreon. The art style also looks a lot like what Honkibooty generates.
ai-tracker said:
Is this AI generated or Honkibooty's alt account?
Their time between image uploads on twitter is short but there's no patreon. The art style also looks a lot like what Honkibooty generates.
I don't see anything particularly suspicious; I could be wrong, but I don't think this is ai-generated, at least not without human input.
I could use a second opinion on artist #527932. I'm interested in their yuri posts, but some of their older works are tagged as ai-generated on Pixiv. I looked through their art and the eyes and surrounding area can be suspicious at times, post #10240213 is an example. However, it's minute enough that I may just be imagining it, thus my post here.
Placeholder1996 said:
I could use a second opinion on artist #527932. I'm interested in their yuri posts, but some of their older works are tagged as ai-generated on Pixiv. I looked through their art and the eyes and surrounding area can be suspicious at times, post #10240213 is an example. However, it's minute enough that I may just be imagining it, thus my post here.
post #10240213
6 toes. Eyelashes look extremely messy and artifact-ey as you've said. Uneven pupils too. The rightmost hair blends with her shirt.
koborudo said:
post #10240213
6 toes. Eyelashes look extremely messy and artifact-ey as you've said. Uneven pupils too. The rightmost hair blends with her shirt.
damn. Thanks for looking. I can't flag any of their posts as I'm out of them at the moment.
AI-Assisted?
Looking at the artists progress there is a clear and natural progression from 9 years ago till August. Then suddenly the artstyle completely changes within a few weeks to a common AI style.
It feels like they improved more over a few weeks/couple months than the 8 years prior
They have a timelapse but I'm not convinced.
Placeholder1996 said:
We were talking about this post just above. I tagged it with ai-generated since a lot of their posts have noticeable artifacts around the eyes. That may have been to rash on my part if it is ai-assisted.
Sorry, I mislinked.. I edited it with the proper post
More screwed up hands from archapxl in post #10168523. I'm inclined to believe almost everything this artist has posted since 2024 is traced-over genAI.
TempTemp123 said:
AI-Assisted?
Looking at the artists progress there is a clear and natural progression from 9 years ago till August. Then suddenly the artstyle completely changes within a few weeks to a common AI style.
It feels like they improved more over a few weeks/couple months than the 8 years prior
They have a timelapse but I'm not convinced.
Something that stands out to me is the way the anatomy in their recent pieces is either really mediocre or quite good. It's actually worse in the pieces with simpler framing, which is pretty suspect. And I agree that the timelapse is not very convincing. Low angle poses like that can be pretty difficult, but the sketch present at the start of the video has very few construction lines, and almost all of the details put down in the next phase are done in one pass. They do lay down some draft lighting that is significantly different from the final, though.
Feels like oeilvert_fft is AI-gen or assisted? post #10127044 has messed up fishnets, and post #10137702 has weird looking fur trim and the side lace.
Found a singular making-of on Twitter https://x.com/OeilVert_FFT/status/1889320868796576216 and after watching it I want to say maybe the "errors" are stylistic choices or issues from scanning (it looks like he draws traditionally then scans it?) but idk. I'll leave post #10134345 here too for someone smarter to decipher
Updated by user 1434626
What are the odds of AI being involved here, at least to a certain extent? The way the face is drawn feels quite different from the rest of the body, both in terms of detailing and coloring. Not sure if that's because of the blurriness in the non-focused areas or something else. The fabric of the swimsuit also has that something to it I think is very common in AI-generated images; almost feels like the face was drawn onto an image that had been generated.
Granted, I hope I'm wrong; I recently commissioned an illustration from the artist and, given the long break between that illustration and their last works prior to that, it felt very different compared to the style they'd been known for, which would possibly explain use of AI in what would be their next illustration after that.
Edit: Granted, less detailing for the face is not exactly unheard of; https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=dorachan_r&z=1 for instance also tends to draw faces that seem much less detailed compared to the effort that appears to go into fabrics and bodies.
Updated by Petitssk
Petitssk said:
post #10242684
[...]
I don't see anything suspicious here. For what it's worth, 1447 pixels doesn't seem to be a common width for AI-generated images; there's only 11 images on Danbooru with that width which are tagged with either ai-generated or ai-assisted. That's out of over 27,000 such posts since the first AI image.
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/108292085
Any ai-generated image in sight?
post #9220157
Flag without a tag. Is this "IA"?
otokucha's artist page says they're an AI-generator with hand-drawn faces (or at least I think that's what it's saying), but very few of their posts are tagged that way. I only see 12 results for otokucha ai-assisted, out of 319 total posts. I feel like if Danbooru can only confidently say 4% of their images are AI-assisted, that note should probably be removed (assuming they don't publicly admit to using AI).
That said, here's some suspicious posts just from their recent uploads:
post #10248668 metal thing below her belly looks weird, the rightmost strap connecting to it looks weird
post #9587227 braid looks fucked up zoomed in
post #10203358 chains look fucked up, if they're even supposed to be chains
post #9133469 pompoms are kind of suspicious
post #9492364 area around her shirt buttons looks weird, especially the button below her cleavage
post #9236933 dude's face looks weird in a way that's hard to describe
ion288 said:
post #9220157
Flag without a tag. Is this "IA"?
The only weird thing I see about this one is how Teto's left hair drill just kind of "disappears". Everything else seems fine though? Need a second opinion.
