Posted under General
wavedash said:
otokucha's artist page says they're an AI-generator with hand-drawn faces...
That wiki was written with zero proof, so I deleted it. post #9745764 was the only instance of "headshopping" they've ever done (on their own work, though), so I assume that's what they based the wiki on, but that's not evidence of anything other than laziness.
@whiteloveit why are you tagging ai-generated on otokucha? You have proof?
I wanted to get another opinion on this artist penova
posts are mainly NSFW
1) New artist from May 2025 based on socials
2) post #10199906 - shading looks glossy/shiny like ai-assisted
3) post #10137795 - face coloring/detail looks really flat compared to other artworks like post #10173805
post #9592441
Flagg claims artifacts but I'm not seeing them.
ion288 said:
post #9592441
Flagg claims artifacts but I'm not seeing them.
It's hard to say for sure. I think there are areas that look like ai-artifacts if you look hard enough, but they're not extreme enough for me to be certain at all. The dimensions aren't one of the typical AI dimensions and the account isn't pumping out art at an unsustainable rate. I could be wrong, but I lean towards human on this one.
ion288 said:
post #9592441
Flagg claims artifacts but I'm not seeing them.
IMO post #9524673 by this artist is the one raising the most questions but I feel like Neru's hair could also be a normal human error
I'm using a translator.
This series of images from this artist is clearly AI-generated, so I've tagged it. I apologize if there are any issues. [post #10248668]
Specific Features Leading to AI Generation Judgment
Bracelet on Right Wrist
１：The line art appears to have melted in the highlighted areas.
２：There are areas where thin lines are doubled, and unlike the line art in other areas, there are jagged edges.
Hair Around the Neck
３：It has gone behind the neck of the swimsuit.
４：Swimsuit Around the Chest
The line art has melted in places. This is particularly evident in the line supporting the lower part of the right chest (left side as viewed from the front).
A thick, wire-like line is clearly visible near the outside of the body, but it melts and disappears as it approaches the chest. This is a feature not seen on the swimsuit on the left chest (right side as viewed from the front), and it is clear that this is not the design.
５：Metal Fittings Around the Waist
The line art has melted. This is particularly obvious in the metal parts, where the design frame has disappeared in some areas.
６：Swimsuit Around the Crotch
The line drawing has melted.
There are also areas where the swimsuit and the skin meet, creating a double layer.
A large number of similar AI-generated features are also visible in this artist's other illustrations. Does this serve as a sufficient explanation?
hasu_no_tokimeki said:
@whiteloveit why are you tagging ai-generated on otokucha? You have proof?
how about this artist
artist #163984
post #5868227
post #5359821
post #6673569
I'm using a translator,too.
This artist tends to generate the characters and backgrounds separately and then merge them together, so the backgrounds often contain various AI-generated artifacts or perspective errors.
https://x.com/Previeww0/status/1842736124818563330
I think the hair in this one also shows some AI characteristics. I’m not very good at judging these things myself, but since this artist has been involved in some past controversies and was mentioned in other discussion forums, I wanted to see what others think.
Stating for the record: if you don't flag the image, I'm going to assume you're vandals and revert them when I try to flag AI-generated status:active. It happens enough as is.
ion288 said:
post #9592441
Flagg claims artifacts but I'm not seeing them.
It's AI. You can see the diffusion noise patterns on the sweaters(this isn't a compression artifact, that it's from pixiv is even more evidence as such), the liner around the eyes is melted to hell and you can see a lot of artifacting on the blush lines.
All of their uploaded work is AI.
hasu_no_tokimeki said:
@whiteloveit why are you tagging ai-generated on otokucha? You have proof?
not that guy but just looking at post #10203358 and it's really obvious. Look at the hands and the melted chain up at the top, there's discoloration on the panties(turns yellow right next to the ribbon, along with standard AI melt stuff), lots of banding on the background gradients, shadow backdrop from the hair not matching the hair presented, etc. You can also just feed it directly into something like thehive.ai and it'll confirm it's SD(hive isn't perfect and can give false negatives but it's fairly legitimate in that it doesn't give false positives).
I'm not going to go through al the guys work but it's all pretty obvious. Even looking at his older stuff there's a lot of AI artifacts and you'll notice generated noise if you look at highlights/darkened areas.
[I'm using a translator]
To be honest, I'm surprised that I only just recently found out about the existence of a topic concerning AI generation. (I had no idea that you could even interact with people on Danbooru.)
The artist I was focusing on this time clearly uses AI generation, so I tagged many images in my spare time out of kindness (though not all of them due to time constraints). I apologize if this caused any trouble.
In the past, based on my personal judgment, I have tagged images that I was 100% confident were AI-generated. Is that okay to do? (I didn't tag many images at once, like in this recent case.)
When other people point out suspicious images, they explain in words what is suspicious about them. Should I refrain from attaching images to explain them, as I did? (I would like to refer to this if I need to do it again in the future.)
I would be grateful for any advice you can give me. (Please refrain from using difficult words, as they confuse the translator.)
Thank you for reading.
This artist was brought up at Discord that they might be using AI at certain degree. What do you think?
somehow went through approval. wrong bowtie pattern.
I noticed that post #10246504 and post #10246507 are from an artist labeled as an AI-prompter. Since they already got flagged and reapproved, I'm posting them here before flagging them myself
There's some talk on twitter over past desiderium potentially using AI in Chinese Project Moon spaces. here's some of the works being discussed and a link to the thread
FivePastNever said:
I noticed that post #10246504 and post #10246507 are from an artist labeled as an AI-prompter. Since they already got flagged and reapproved, I'm posting them here before flagging them myself
They where flagged but not tagged. I tagged them.
Flagged without a tag, again!
ion288 said:
post #9879814
Flagged without a tag, again!
I stand by what I said in forum #388159 about it; I’m pretty sure this is human.
ion288 said:
Flagged without a tag, again!
This is getting absurd. How many times do we have to rebuke the AI accusation towards this artist? I am starting to believe it's just the same one or two people here who keep flagging this artist out of personal spite.
123kid said:
This is getting absurd. How many times do we have to rebuke the AI accusation towards this artist? I am starting to believe it's just the same one or two people here who keep flagging this artist out of personal spite.
Or it's the kind of person who thinks "it looks like an AI style, therefore it's AI" without doing any research into it; frustrating to say the least.
