AI-generated art check thread

MaskedAvenger said in forum #435198:

asset #47940887

Having doubts about this and the "artist."

two left hands
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2032783354291171435
01 number tattoo on miku's shoulder in
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2026057761835135187
while not in
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2030722326887837773
unreadable melted letters on the upper right corner
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2030042356792316247
inconsistent bikini design
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2025117354213150735

ggraphy said in forum #435213:

I believe it's more of making fun of people calling them using AI defined by "I've been using AI even before there was no AI"

So they would rather be called an artist that sucks at everything and never cares what they draw than an AI-artist.

eromelon said in forum #435217:
two left hands
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2032783354291171435
01 number tattoo on miku's shoulder in
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2026057761835135187
while not in
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2030722326887837773
unreadable melted letters on the upper right corner
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2030042356792316247
inconsistent bikini design
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2025117354213150735

With those I have no doubts they are an AI artist.

So they would rather be called an artist that sucks at everything and never cares what they draw than an AI-artist.

Some, if not all AI artists from my experience can't admit the fact that they are incapable of drawing and using an AI tool to assist them. If they were willing we would not have this thread or this issue. Even on Pixiv recently a lot of people stopped tagging their art as AI Generated (this is a tick you have when uploading an image) so that it would be on the main page due to the recent changes with how Pixiv promoted images to users. I have all AI generated works disabled on my Pixiv account and was trusting on it to protect me, but if you check my deleted posts over half are people not tagging their art properly and me missing out on reading their artist wiki.

MaskedAvenger said in forum #435198:

asset #47940887

Having doubts about this and the "artist."

AI, see asset #47946712

ggraphy said in forum #435220:

With those I have no doubts they are an AI artist.

Some, if not all AI artists from my experience can't admit the fact that they are incapable of drawing and using an AI tool to assist them. If they were willing we would not have this thread or this issue. Even on Pixiv recently a lot of people stopped tagging their art as AI Generated (this is a tick you have when uploading an image) so that it would be on the main page due to the recent changes with how Pixiv promoted images to users. I have all AI generated works disabled on my Pixiv account and was trusting on it to protect me, but if you check my deleted posts over half are people not tagging their art properly and me missing out on reading their artist wiki.

Yeah thats how they get'cha, most of them are dishonest and will not tag the illustrations as AI, and that's all it takes for them to show up in the search..
Due to the 10 tag limit on Pixiv (without premium, i think) You won't be able to tag them yourself. Plus i think they could just remove it anyway.

I'm pretty certain post #11237363 and children are AI (see the flag for why). The artist's other post, post #10964641, should probably be checked as well.

Placeholder1996 said in forum #435291:

I'm pretty certain post #11237363 and children are AI (see the flag for why). The artist's other post, post #10964641, should probably be checked as well.

I noticed that Reimu's hair blends with the shirt collar on her left, and makes a colored streak from it. Her right pinky also looks like it blended with the gohei. The rest of the artist's pixiv is sus, the ears look generated between asset #47956946 and asset #47956950

shemingwan_wen said in forum #435299:

I noticed that Reimu's hair blends with the shirt collar on her left, and makes a colored streak from it. Her right pinky also looks like it blended with the gohei. The rest of the artist's pixiv is sus, the ears look generated between asset #47956946 and asset #47956950

I can't flag it; I'm out of them at the moment.

I don't know if this is just me but could someone give a second opinion on shaul221 because some of their work got uploaded recently and to me it looks like it has telltale signs of being AI. Aside from looking like they're just taking AI-gen engine based off of puuzaki puuna works, there's also inconsistencies with small details.

post #10847364 has weirdly inconsistent quality, especially for the collar, the bell, the earring, and other accessories.
post #10847371 looks like the finger that can be seen is very poorly drawn
post #11245020 ribbon looks to almost be merging with hair, cross stitching is weirdly off on the one column, trim on the gloves doesn't match with each other

I'm more than willing to admit that these could just be artist errors, but looking at what's been uploaded there's just something about most of the work that seems off to me. I'd appreciate if other's could take a look and chime in.

post #11188666
Flag without a tag. Artist "sometimes" uses AI, so presumably not all the time.

cawl
Posts several artworks a day, I'm starting to think that there's some degree of AI involvement in there.

post #11250464
An artist declared this (and likely other of the previous art drawn by this guy) as using AI-tracing.

Grahf said in forum #435544:

I don't know if this is just me but could someone give a second opinion on shaul221 because some of their work got uploaded recently and to me it looks like it has telltale signs of being AI. Aside from looking like they're just taking AI-gen engine based off of puuzaki puuna works, there's also inconsistencies with small details.

post #10847364 has weirdly inconsistent quality, especially for the collar, the bell, the earring, and other accessories.
post #10847371 looks like the finger that can be seen is very poorly drawn
post #11245020 ribbon looks to almost be merging with hair, cross stitching is weirdly off on the one column, trim on the gloves doesn't match with each other

I'm more than willing to admit that these could just be artist errors, but looking at what's been uploaded there's just something about most of the work that seems off to me. I'd appreciate if other's could take a look and chime in.

Just poor quality.

The blush line on post #10847364 can match under the hair.
On post #11245020, you can see coloring errors that AI can't do.

GranAutismo said in forum #435604:

cawl
Posts several artworks a day, I'm starting to think that there's some degree of AI involvement in there.

The only bug i can find is on pixiv #143327948, Shun's animal ear fluff on some scenes are different.
I think 15% possibly is AI-assisted, less than 1% is AI-gen

masasirai is an AI prompter.

See:
asset #48002959 (post #8810045)
asset #48002965 (post #8739933)
asset #48002980 (pixiv #129182842)

Why you think his artworks are ai-assisted?

It seems to be nonamethanks' fault. Nonamethanks is the website's deputy owner, so everyone, include me, ignored the truth.

I think milliani has either ai-generated or ai-assisted content.

I wasn't sure at first because they do post on pixiv what would seem to be their sketches, but I got more suspicious after almost posting this (explicit) image where the man's pants just make no sense.

https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/135648549

There is also post #7992563, which just doesn't make any sense with how the baby is being held up by extra hands.

I'm thinking most of it is ai-assisted because you often wouldn't notice with many of the works (I didn't, for sure) but after seeing that post, I'm 99% sure they're using an AI tool and then got better with retouching the images.