AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

B17Bomber said in forum #434744:

It says AI in the pixiv tags. It's definitely touched up a lot by the artist, but you got to take them at their word. They're all at least AI assisted

If you click on the button to add tags on Pixiv, the AI tag shows up with an X instead of a padlock, which means it was most likely not added by the author of the work.

Missingno2024 said in forum #434745:

If you click on the button to add tags on Pixiv, the AI tag shows up with an X instead of a padlock, which means it was most likely not added by the author of the work.

Does Pixiv timestamp when a tag was added? I wonder if it was added by someone from here because of the flags.

worldendertenshi said in forum #434738:

it would be impossible for AI to generate a background this coherent post #11031667

it's entirely possible to paste an ai-generated foreground character on a 3d-traced or filtered background.

that said, some of the hair in this artist's posts does feel really strange to me in a non human way. But overall I'm just not sure.

Updated by FubukiKai

tremolo_measure said in forum #434694:

To avoid any further confusion, I believe all of this artist’s uploads should be removed from Danbooru, as there is no guarantee that any of them are not traced.

This would make them AI-assisted which is allowed on our site, and they look redrawn instead of the other AI-assisted posts on the site where only human touches were made on an otherwise fully AI-generated image.

artms said in forum #434869:

Moona's earring, pocket carrot, and eyes are all kinds of messed up. Same with Pekora's eyes (especially where her hair meets eye) and neck bow/shape in the middle

What about their other art? Should we just edit their artist tag to "AI Artist do not upload" ?

shemingwan_wen said in forum #432952:

At the very least they may be tracing, I've always felt like their lineart is not up to par with the shading. You could also compare the finished and unfinished drawings: post #9358529 and post #8551224

I still feel like something's off with this artist. While maybe the lining can be wonky i do feel like the rendering/shading is the weirdest part.

The lineart quality and rendering do not match, it feels like.

MaskedAvenger said in forum #435209:

Style looks AI-like, hence the doubts.

I do agree on that. The example they have provided has a completely different style than what it currently is and the fact that someone else also had their suspicion about it to call them up on it.

ggraphy said in forum #435211:

I do agree on that. The example they have provided has a completely different style than what it currently is and the fact that someone else also had their suspicion about it to call them up on it.

They don't seem to be opposed to using AI. I've checked a bit of their gallery and i do see the gemini watermark on some of them.

I'd say it's AI Generated personally.

Edit : Well, this post.. i'm not sure if it's being wrongly translated but i think they're admitting it?

1 232 233 234 235 236 237