AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

eromelon

MaskedAvenger said in forum #435198:

asset #47940887

Having doubts about this and the "artist."

two left hands
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2032783354291171435
01 number tattoo on miku's shoulder in
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2026057761835135187
while not in
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2030722326887837773
unreadable melted letters on the upper right corner
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2030042356792316247
inconsistent bikini design
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2025117354213150735

ggraphy said in forum #435213:

I believe it's more of making fun of people calling them using AI defined by "I've been using AI even before there was no AI"

So they would rather be called an artist that sucks at everything and never cares what they draw than an AI-artist.

Reply
ggraphy

eromelon said in forum #435217:
two left hands
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2032783354291171435
01 number tattoo on miku's shoulder in
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2026057761835135187
while not in
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2030722326887837773
unreadable melted letters on the upper right corner
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2030042356792316247
inconsistent bikini design
https://x.com/kyasarin334/status/2025117354213150735

With those I have no doubts they are an AI artist.

So they would rather be called an artist that sucks at everything and never cares what they draw than an AI-artist.

Some, if not all AI artists from my experience can't admit the fact that they are incapable of drawing and using an AI tool to assist them. If they were willing we would not have this thread or this issue. Even on Pixiv recently a lot of people stopped tagging their art as AI Generated (this is a tick you have when uploading an image) so that it would be on the main page due to the recent changes with how Pixiv promoted images to users. I have all AI generated works disabled on my Pixiv account and was trusting on it to protect me, but if you check my deleted posts over half are people not tagging their art properly and me missing out on reading their artist wiki.

Reply
FrostedLeaf

ggraphy said in forum #435220:

With those I have no doubts they are an AI artist.

Some, if not all AI artists from my experience can't admit the fact that they are incapable of drawing and using an AI tool to assist them. If they were willing we would not have this thread or this issue. Even on Pixiv recently a lot of people stopped tagging their art as AI Generated (this is a tick you have when uploading an image) so that it would be on the main page due to the recent changes with how Pixiv promoted images to users. I have all AI generated works disabled on my Pixiv account and was trusting on it to protect me, but if you check my deleted posts over half are people not tagging their art properly and me missing out on reading their artist wiki.

Yeah thats how they get'cha, most of them are dishonest and will not tag the illustrations as AI, and that's all it takes for them to show up in the search..
Due to the 10 tag limit on Pixiv (without premium, i think) You won't be able to tag them yourself. Plus i think they could just remove it anyway.

Reply
shemingwan wen

Placeholder1996 said in forum #435291:

I'm pretty certain post #11237363 and children are AI (see the flag for why). The artist's other post, post #10964641, should probably be checked as well.

I noticed that Reimu's hair blends with the shirt collar on her left, and makes a colored streak from it. Her right pinky also looks like it blended with the gohei. The rest of the artist's pixiv is sus, the ears look generated between asset #47956946 and asset #47956950

Reply
Grahf

I don't know if this is just me but could someone give a second opinion on shaul221 because some of their work got uploaded recently and to me it looks like it has telltale signs of being AI. Aside from looking like they're just taking AI-gen engine based off of puuzaki puuna works, there's also inconsistencies with small details.

post #10847364 has weirdly inconsistent quality, especially for the collar, the bell, the earring, and other accessories.
post #10847371 looks like the finger that can be seen is very poorly drawn
post #11245020 ribbon looks to almost be merging with hair, cross stitching is weirdly off on the one column, trim on the gloves doesn't match with each other

I'm more than willing to admit that these could just be artist errors, but looking at what's been uploaded there's just something about most of the work that seems off to me. I'd appreciate if other's could take a look and chime in.

Reply
馮福水牛校軾昆

Grahf said in forum #435544:

I don't know if this is just me but could someone give a second opinion on shaul221 because some of their work got uploaded recently and to me it looks like it has telltale signs of being AI. Aside from looking like they're just taking AI-gen engine based off of puuzaki puuna works, there's also inconsistencies with small details.

post #10847364 has weirdly inconsistent quality, especially for the collar, the bell, the earring, and other accessories.
post #10847371 looks like the finger that can be seen is very poorly drawn
post #11245020 ribbon looks to almost be merging with hair, cross stitching is weirdly off on the one column, trim on the gloves doesn't match with each other

I'm more than willing to admit that these could just be artist errors, but looking at what's been uploaded there's just something about most of the work that seems off to me. I'd appreciate if other's could take a look and chime in.

Just poor quality.

The blush line on post #10847364 can match under the hair.
On post #11245020, you can see coloring errors that AI can't do.

Reply
1 233 234 235 236 237