Danbooru

Comments

Blacklisted:
Show 8 more comments
[hidden]

Varike said:

I'm pretty sure that was the point, they're both harmless kinks when kept to the realm of fiction by a functional adult, it's the nonfunctional people who go further who are the problem, yet the groups in question hold this double standard between them.

That's really not how their comment reads to me. It reads like they're saying that furry content should be criticized, and it's hypocritical that they criticize loli/shota but glorify furry.

But that point doesn't make any sense if both kinks are harmless. If furry is harmless, then why use it as an example of hypocrisy? It's not a double standard if there's nothing wrong with the kink.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    blindVigil said:

    That's really not how their comment reads to me. It reads like they're saying that furry content should be criticized, and it's hypocritical that they criticize loli/shota but glorify furry.

    But that point doesn't make any sense if both kinks are harmless. If furry is harmless, then why use it as an example of hypocrisy? It's not a double standard if there's nothing wrong with the kink.

    Maybe it was about the fact neither kids nor animals can give consent in real life? They may be conflating furries with zoophiles.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Blank_User said:

    Maybe it was about the fact neither kids nor animals can give consent in real life? They may be conflating furries with zoophiles.

    While furries who are zoophiles are definitely a minority, they are more common than anybody would prefer.

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Wtf is this hot garbage, why a person who just for expample, wants to play a simple silly game or whatever shit is in appstore, compare to literal pedofiles, I know that you will say "achtualy is a drawing of a girl, not a literal girl", it is still by definition an attraction to minors, and what is it about society to demonize video games as if they were Hitler's machination to destroy minorities or something similar, jeez

  • -3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    high_status_bastard said:

    Wtf is this hot garbage, why a person who just for expample, wants to play a simple silly game or whatever shit is in appstore, compare to literal pedofiles, I know that you will say "achtualy is a drawing of a girl, not a literal girl", it is still by definition an attraction to minors, and what is it about society to demonize video games as if they were Hitler's machination to destroy minorities or something similar, jeez

    Just so you know, the artist regularly draws loli stuff. This is just a joke, not a hit piece.

    It's also not still "by definition" an attraction to minors. I happen to be okay with loli, but the idea of doing anything with a real child makes me physically ill. Child abusers are scum, and I don't understand how anyone could be attracted to those noisy, snot filled gremlins.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    CrimsonClouder said:

    I hate being a naysayers but I feel like something's off with this piece.

    I 100% agree. The ribbons, the flowers, the neck band's knot/ribbon are all weirdly deformed and are not consistent at all, and her sarong has weird gaps and don't make sense.
    EDIT: I also colorpicked it, while not definitive proof, it goes nuts when you drag it across the white background.

    Updated

  • 1
  • Reply
  • 1 2 3 4 5