Comments

@winkywonker should be Q. Please be careful

sorry, I forget easily.

though it is confusing on whether it's sensitive or questionable.

winkywonker said:

sorry, I forget easily.

though it is confusing on whether it's sensitive or questionable.

Don't worry.
Also, if the characters is naked, it's should be Q.
If the characters wear bikini/swimsuit/ something show navel/clevevage it's should be S, unless it show nipples/penis.

You can read the rate guidelines for more info.

I added the Starcraft tag, as "Kikkuk222" videos (which this is a reference of) usually references. I never played the game but from his videos the scream at the end seens to be a unit death or something.

EDIT - example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBqf0Be-h0c

osana sakuya when

XoanTwist said:

osana sakuya when

Don't f@#king jinx it

I hate to admit it, but this feels tiny bit disturbing to look at. Probably because human hands shouldn't have stuff stretching out like that (unless you have some mean ass parasites).

Wait, did that Scyllarian just spelled 'Nihao'?

Censorship is in reference to Azur Lane JP's reuploaded, albeit heavily-censored tweet announcing her skin.

https://twitter.com/azurlane_staff/status/1793972810781806881

Not surprised people are starting to meme it, the censorship already seemed like a joke. They absolutely did not need to censor the entire image save for her face.

dangrello said:

Censorship is in reference to Azur Lane JP's reuploaded, albeit heavily-censored tweet announcing her skin.

https://twitter.com/azurlane_staff/status/1793972810781806881

Thanks, Musk.

CGrascal said:

Thanks, Musk.

Funny how the "Free speech warrior" has limited the amount on his new toy

dangrello said:

Censorship is in reference to Azur Lane JP's reuploaded, albeit heavily-censored tweet announcing her skin.

https://twitter.com/azurlane_staff/status/1793972810781806881

So-called free speech absolutists when they realize people are free to avoid them:

firemage22 said:

Funny how the "Free speech warrior" has limited the amount on his new toy

I call it hypocrite.

This is me almost every night. Well, in my case, I'm the guy (obviously) and, the pillows are under me. Not quite the same as being on top of a sexy pritty kitty with Chun-Li-like legs but, hey.

I takes. What I gets. Where I can gets it.

Minami Ward, Saitama.

Google Street View

🤩fav

reference

Demundo said:
They are there for decoration, not practical uses.

And I already said that I think they look bad. And I think I'm right about that, because I sure don't see a lot of people wearing such tiny hats, neither for daily use or special occasions.
Of course nobody wears them, they look silly.

blindVigil said:
I will never understand some people's irrational hatred of small hats.

I never said I HATE tiny hats, I just dislike them. Don't put words in my mouth.
How can an opinion about aesthetics be "irrational"?
And how is this overreaction against me simply disliking the small hats not a lot more irrational? What's so wrong with disliking tiny hats?

BrokenEagle98 said:

For someone that browses an anime site full of Japanese culture, they sure as heck don't understand Japanese culture

You don't have to like everything about Japan.

You can downvote me, but you can't seem to articulate what I've said that's so wrong.

Man, just take the L and go away already. Nobody was responding because everyone is tired of you. In case it's not clear to you, you're getting downvoted because of the negativity and bad manners. It's generally considered bad form to bad mouth other people or cultures.

AlsoSprachOdin said:

And I already said that I think they look bad. And I think I'm right about that, because I sure don't see a lot of people wearing such tiny hats, neither for daily use or special occasions.
Of course nobody wears them, they look silly.

You are right that these mini hat and mini caps are not worn daily.
But people do wear them as a decorative piece of clothing in certain kind of fashions.
A common usage is when they are used in performances, like in Takarazuka.

Other examples are in Lolita fashions.
If you think they are silly being tiny as they are, you haven't seen them being decorated with all sort of stuff.
And it's not limited to just Japanese Lolita Fashion either.
Though, I have to say, mini hats are conisdered hard to coordinate, but there are certain formulars to make them work like balancing them with hair style, or with other accessories...

If you think those are just weird fashions, how about Marie Antoinette Fashion?
(the picture is actually from a film recreating it, not the actual person, because, duh)
The actual person is depicted with mini hat over a large head of hair (wig) though.
Needless to say, she still defined fashion quite a bit, even to this day.

Point is, your opinion is not the only opinion and thus even if it's right to you, it's not objectively correct because there are actual people thinking the other way.
Opinion about aesthetics being "irrational" is something keep happening again and again through time, and Marie Antoinette is the embodiment of said "irrationality" in her time, but she did make a lot of change to perception to aesthetics and beauty. So you not being fond of mini hats is normal, but other people being fond of it should not be "irrational" either. It might be a whole culture/sub-culture you did not know or understand there.

Lastly, you seems to be dismissal of mini hats, but you did not even prove how right you are and only claim to be right.
That's not how you do arguments. Just saying.
That's the thing made me write this over an hour finding the relevant example and mincing my words so they are not affected by the annoyance I got from your comments.

At least try to be a proper person man. That should get you more sympathizers than not.

BrokenEagle98 said:
Man, just take the L and go away already.

... Mmmno, I don't feel like it. Might be the way you talk to me inspires spite.

BrokenEagle98 said:
Nobody was responding because everyone is tired of you.

Really didn't take much, especially considering how much you seem to care.

BrokenEagle98 said:
It's generally considered bad form to bad mouth other people or cultures.

Are you serious? If I say the giant, furry hats the English royal guards wear look silly, now I'm suddenly badmouthing the entire English culture? Can we not be a little more nuanced than that?
And people? When did I say someone is a bad person for liking stupid-looking hats? Again, nuance. It is in fact YOU guys who are saying that I'm a bad person for disliking some hats.
FFS, people. I'm "bad-mouthing" some hats, it's really should not be such a big deal.

Demundo said:
Point is, your opinion is not the only opinion and thus even if it's right to you, it's not objectively correct because there are actual people thinking the other way.

Why do you think this needs to be explained? If someone says they don't like chili hotdogs, do you start telling them off for having an opinion that's contrary to all the chili hotdog enjoyers? Of course I know my opinion isn't objective metaphysical truth, but sometimes I just want to express my opinions without prefacing them with disclaimers like "in my opinion", "in general but not in all outlying cases", or "I know the universe is an absurd, random dance of dust and objective truth is impossible, but I FEEL like..." because honestly this should all go without saying, at least after we've all heard and said it the first hundred times.

Opinion about aesthetics being "irrational" is something keep happening again and again through time

Yes yes yes, everything is subjective. But someone claiming to enjoy eating broken glass doesn't mean broken glass is proper food - we can surely agree on this if we just put our figurative feet on the ground and our heads out of the philosophical clouds. And if you have a hat whose form does not fit any purpose but decoration, and is almost exclusively worn by niche fashion enthusiasts or those who're several centuries in the past, a hat which if worn by the average child would see them mercilessly mocked and bullied, then it's probably because most people find that they look silly. I'm not saying that popular opinion defines truth, but if most people can agree - as I think they do out of the internet - that tiny hats look silly, then I think it's reasonable to say, in a not-so-strictly philosophical manner, but for all practical intents, that they look silly.

Lastly, you seems to be dismissal of mini hats, but you did not even prove how right you are and only claim to be right.

Well yeah, as we've agreed, this is not something that can be proven as such. I won't claim to have ever proven my case, only argued for it, just like you've not proven that these hats don't look silly, you've simply argued your case. And arguing is absolutely how you "do arguments", lots of things can be argued for and against forever without anything ever being proven. Like philosophy.

At least try to be a proper person man.

Aaaaand here we are again. How in the actual fuck does me saying I think tiny hats look silly make me an "improper person"? I think it says much more about you that you would make such drastic judgements about someone for saying something so innocuous.

It's just a silly hat, people. I'd prefer it wasn't in the picture, but I'd even more prefer that you guys get some perspective.

AlsoSprachOdin said:

Of course nobody wears them, they look silly.

AlsoSprachOdin said:
It's just a silly hat, people. I'd prefer it wasn't in the picture, but I'd even more prefer that you guys get some perspective.

Problem is at how you are not presenting it as your thoughts and even made claims on "facts" instead of "opinion.

Yes. I think they are silly hats too.
But that doesn't make claiming your opinion as fact any better just because they are your opinion.

That's the problem.
Should you just said you felt they are jut ridiculous, I bet not that many people would have objected to what you said.

Kinda shocked this isn't a strike witches character