Tagged Maeda_kaori as you can clearly see Nice Nature drank beer like her VA does.
0
Reply
T-72_Ural said in comment #2600009:
I'm fairly certain that Uma behind NTR is Teio, but not 100% certain...
Ear decs tell me that's Doto. You can also see an ahoge on her, which Teio lacks.
Adam Lanza photo reference:
Paper in the backgorund is Robert Hawkins' suicide note
edit: holy fuck, stop flagging stylized real life art as "off-topic" just because it depicts a real life person, even the animification ones, (post #11331212) and it's literally ONLY to true crime posts. This is clearly targetted, I'm really pissed off.
Updated by alexr05
alexr05 said in comment #2597711:
Adam Lanza photo reference:
Paper in the backgorund is Robert Hawkins' suicide note
edit: holy fuck, stop flagging stylized real life art as "off-topic" just because it depicts a real life person, even the animification ones, (post #11331212) and it's literally ONLY to true crime posts. This is clearly targetted, I'm really pissed off.
There are other platforms that art like this can posted on; I like drawings of real life but not of school shooters
Jinxdafox said in comment #2600003:
There are other platforms that art like this can posted on; I like drawings of real life but not of school shooters
Use your blacklist. I'm not a fan of these either, but they're not against the rules.
Cyril1214 said in comment #2594475:
Adam wasn't defending pedophilia he was using pedophilia to deconstruct the framework of social and cultural structures, and the arbitrary nature of morality
that might be why he said he believed there shouldn't be an age of consent, how his wet dream was to live in the wild with apes, and used Travis the Chimp as an analogy for himself that he was a victim of human civilization who only then acted out in violence from his environment because he wanted to be free from society's structures
alexr05 said in comment #2594480:
that might be why he said he believed there shouldn't be an age of consent, how his wet dream was to live in the wild with apes, and used Travis the Chimp as an analogy for himself that he was a victim of human civilization who only then acted out in violence from his environment because he wanted to be free from society's structures
Adam referenced pedophilia in the sense that we have all been abused by the system, implying that when true connection exists, age should be irrelevant. He did not view the interaction between a child and an adult as inherently harmful; however, he noted that society immediately categorizes it as pedophilia and labels the minor as a victim of abuse. His core argument was that society uses these taboos to maintain a hierarchy of control, where the 'protection' of children is actually a form of ownership that strips them of their autonomy.
Cyril1214 said in comment #2594500:
Adam referenced pedophilia in the sense that we have all been abused by the system, implying that when true connection exists, age should be irrelevant. He did not view the interaction between a child and an adult as inherently harmful; however, he noted that society immediately categorizes it as pedophilia and labels the minor as a victim of abuse. His core argument was that society uses these taboos to maintain a hierarchy of control, where the 'protection' of children is actually a form of ownership that strips them of their autonomy.
Adam had such interesting philosophy that I haven't seen from any other person, I'm impressed. Did it have any connection to the (debunked) theory that Adam committed the Sandy Hook school shooting to save children from future harm?
alexr05 said in comment #2594504:
Adam had such interesting philosophy that I haven't seen from any other person, I'm impressed. Did it have any connection to the (debunked) theory that Adam committed the Sandy Hook school shooting to save children from future harm?
To start with the conclusion. I don't think he did it to save children from future harm
His motivation wasn't "saving." It was an extreme hatred of imposition itself. life, meaning, suffering all imposed prisons. He didn't kill to convey any kind of value. He did it because he had already completely detached from "relationships" and "value." Death, to him, wasn't liberation it was the end of value. And value was what he hated most in this life
That theory you mentioned tries to give his actions some kind of "benevolent" motive but that directly contradicts his true nihilistic stance
Leave a comment