Comments

[hidden]

Surprised this artist has gone so long without tripping AI flags. Maybe im not keeping up and i am too slow but the way the text is written on all these posts, the outlines, and heavy use of character censoring which is a frequent thing when I see someone selling AI sets on pixiv or fanza.

[hidden]

MilkDelivery said in comment #2591235:

Surprised this artist has gone so long without tripping AI flags. Maybe im not keeping up and i am too slow but the way the text is written on all these posts, the outlines, and heavy use of character censoring which is a frequent thing when I see someone selling AI sets on pixiv or fanza.

No you're right, I've looked around and everything I found is pushing me in a single direction: they're someone using AI-generated images to make quick cash. The reason why they're probably not tripping AI flags is because they edited the image with censorship among other things. Most posts resolution are 1024x1456: it's all AI.

[hidden]

@flow2202 The full-size images on Twitter have a lower resolution than the ones you're posting here. Are you the artist? Are these the original versions?

If you're the artist, then you should tag these with self-upload and either remove the source or replace it with a link that actually leads to the same file. If this is the image's original resolution and it was just made smaller for Twitter, then you can make your upload the parent. For this one, you would make it the parent of post #11098811.

If you commissioned the post and it's the original version, do the same as above but replace self-upload with commissioner upload.

If this is an upscaled version of the Twitter image (upscaled by someone other than the artist), you should make post #11098801 the parent of this post instead.

1 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90