Comments

[hidden]

I mean, Akagi in this specific page look cute and innocent so seeing her being trolled feel like unjustified... Then you remember the WHOLE comic's premice, and secretly, you ask yourself "Is that the start of a REVENGE like a war of attrition ?". Akagi kinda deserve it after all.

[hidden]

Myschi said:

I mean, Akagi in this specific page look cute and innocent so seeing her being trolled feel like unjustified... Then you remember the WHOLE comic's premice, and secretly, you ask yourself "Is that the start of a REVENGE like a war of attrition ?". Akagi kinda deserve it after all.

Grim promised Amagi he wouldn't attack Akagi or Kaga ever again.

Not pranking her was not a part of that deal.

[hidden]

JustAGalNamedMadison said in comment #2596865:

why does this have the "implied death" tag when Catherine's ERASURE isn't implied, it's fucking canon?

Because the image only suggests the character died. There is no hard evidence in the image of an actual death.

Generally speaking, tags are based on the content of the image itself, not on outside information. This is usually expressed as "tag what you see, not what you know."

[hidden]

JustAGalNamedMadison said in comment #2596865:

why does this have the "implied death" tag when Catherine's ERASURE isn't implied, it's fucking canon?

This DOES raise the question of how photos work in conjunction with the erasure though...does it just remove them from the picture? Put someone else in their place? Or just erase the photograph itself in its entirety to ensure none may remember her? (It's also quite disturbing to think of what Dante will be able to do once all the golden boughs are stuffed inside him if this is what only a few are needed to do...)

1 2 3 4 5 6