@Ascendant_of_DawnAs a scientist, he helped invent Gears, which turned out to be bad. Also, as the first Gear, a prototype, he wasn't under anyone else's control, so he's the only one that really feels any guilt as he's a lot closer to human.
He also had to canonically kill his wife numerous times and she just keeps coming back.
Ohhh...! That makes a lot more sense! Thanks for the explanation, I'd look it up myself, but I find it much more engaging to see what the community would respond with, so thanks again and have a great day!
1977 Pontiac Can Am. A pretty rare car actually, they only made about 1,300 of them before the mold for its fiberglass rear spoiler broke, forcing them to stop. A sad end for such an amazing car.
Couldn't they just remake the mold? Surely something like that can't be LosTech, right? Mind you I don't know anything about cars or car manufacture, so I might be talking out my bum here.
Couldn't they just remake the mold? Surely something like that can't be LosTech, right? Mind you I don't know anything about cars or car manufacture, so I might be talking out my bum here.
They could, it was upper management's decision to stop production:
Pontiac upper management, already worried about losing sales of their Grand Prix models (the Can Am and the Grand Prix used the same dashboard and console, so a sale of a Can Am was seen as a loss of a sale of a Grand Prix by some senior Pontiac executives), decided to scrap the project after approximately one half year of production.
@ไธๅคฑ่ Do you have some sort of proof that this isn't Violet Evergarden?
Nothing in the image, artist commentary, or source tags suggests that it's Violet. Sure, they have similar hair, but that style is hardly unique to Violet.
@ไธๅคฑ่ Do you have some sort of proof that this isn't Violet Evergarden?
Essentially...
marcymal said:
Nothing in the image, artist commentary, or source tags suggests that it's Violet. Sure, they have similar hair, but that style is hardly unique to Violet.
Also, the person presumed to be the commissioner tagged it with Saber. Someone with the relevant SNS account could ask if she's meant to actually be Saber, a lookalike, whether he's the original commissioner to begin with, etc. https://www.instagram.com/p/CFk6BiNA1eF/
Also, the person presumed to be the commissioner tagged it with Saber. Someone with the relevant SNS account could ask if she's meant to actually be Saber, a lookalike, whether he's the original commissioner to begin with, etc. https://www.instagram.com/p/CFk6BiNA1eF/
Checked. He is indeed the commissioner. And for copyright purposes she is an OC although inspired by Saber (or Violet). This poster is also an official USMC recruiting poster and if anyone prints up copies to sell, their legal department will be in touch. He is working to authorize posters for sale on Etsy.
Nothing in the image, artist commentary, or source tags suggests that it's Violet. Sure, they have similar hair, but that style is hardly unique to Violet.
Her hair was going to be down, but the recruiter DM'd samples of what style he wanted. She's officially an OC.
I hope this is in the DC universe, because no amount of bullshit gets Frank past the initial HOLY FUCK IT'S PUNISHER! in the Marvel Universe, never mind to a job as muscle. Needs one more panel with a guy off-panel shouting "Nice parasol, faggot!"
No, she's not the first nikke or the origin of all NIKKEs. There's plenty of NIKKES before her, standard mass production Nikke even exists before the rapture invasion. But she's the first one to equip Her powerful body since she was a Fighter Jet Pilot and also Ace Card in her squadron. But all those experiences her brain is still can't withstand the side effects of her NIKKE body.
@somethingsomething: According to the wiki, netorare posts on Danbooru "should include the presence of the cheated on in some form, physical or otherwise (such as on the phone, as is common), or mentioned at some significant length". Does any of that apply here?
@somethingsomething: According to the wiki, netorare posts on Danbooru "should include the presence of the cheated on in some form, physical or otherwise (such as on the phone, as is common), or mentioned at some significant length". Does any of that apply here?
When it's tagged as such by the artist, that leads me to think it should be included in the tags here. If tagging rules say that's not the case, then I apologize.
When it's tagged as such by the artist, that leads me to think it should be included in the tags here. If tagging rules say that's not the case, then I apologize.
That's a quite frequent mistake. Tagging should be done in accordance with Danbooru's own definitions, not those of the artist or some other site. The whole point of having definitions is to ensure that each tag has a consistent meaning. Most tags are defined in terms of the content of the image itself, not what people have been saying about it or any other contextual information. There are exceptions, like siblings, but the general principle is to "tag what you see, not what you know". This is stated in howto:tag, and you've been here as long as I have, so I'm a little surprised that this is news to you.
That's a quite frequent mistake. Tagging should be done in accordance with Danbooru's own definitions, not those of the artist or some other site. The whole point of having definitions is to ensure that each tag has a consistent meaning. Most tags are defined in terms of the content of the image itself, not what people have been saying about it or any other contextual information. There are exceptions, like siblings, but the general principle is to "tag what you see, not what you know". This is stated in howto:tag, and you've been here as long as I have, so I'm a little surprised that this is news to you.
It's disappointing that you're getting mass downvoted for giving correct advice. We had a similar problem with users mistagging NTR even after being corrected in post #9950953. The wiki is very clear about what counts and what doesn't. The random users that keep adding the tag should pay attention to this line in particular:
Do not apply this tag if only the artist's commentary mentioned that it was NTR-themed posts but other sign of it being such shown in the image itself (such as the "cuckolded" character being absent).
(Actually, that last part is phrased horribly, but it still shouldn't be too hard to understand.)
For tagging purposes, I would classify Pixiv tags added by the artist at about the same level as or lower than artist commentary, as that's basically what it is except it could also be used to intentionally affect visibility since tagging rules aren't as strict there. It is simply not enough on its own to justify tagging it under our rules. Maybe cheating_(relationship) would apply here, but not netorare. If you disagree, please provide some evidence from the post that indicates NTR without using the artist tags, commentary, or canon lore.
Okay, that's just unfair. Having been introduced to zettai ryouiki on TV Tropes, I can tell you that is quality zettai ryouiki right there and no amount of bottoms gatekeeping can stop that from being the case.
Okay, that's just unfair. Having been introduced to zettai ryouiki on TV Tropes, I can tell you that is quality zettai ryouiki right there and no amount of bottoms gatekeeping can stop that from being the case.
The wiki says to not tag Zettai Ryouiki with shorts, but there's a lot of images with shorts and the tag regardless. So I'm curious if it should be added?
it seems odd for an image used as an official example on the wiki (even if a negative one, as in its use on the zettai ryouiki page) to be deleted... and also (if it matters) given that it's this popular
Leave a comment