@somethingsomething: According to the wiki, netorare posts on Danbooru "should include the presence of the cheated on in some form, physical or otherwise (such as on the phone, as is common), or mentioned at some significant length". Does any of that apply here?

Flopsy said:

@somethingsomething: According to the wiki, netorare posts on Danbooru "should include the presence of the cheated on in some form, physical or otherwise (such as on the phone, as is common), or mentioned at some significant length". Does any of that apply here?

When it's tagged as such by the artist, that leads me to think it should be included in the tags here. If tagging rules say that's not the case, then I apologize.

somethingsomething said:

When it's tagged as such by the artist, that leads me to think it should be included in the tags here. If tagging rules say that's not the case, then I apologize.

That's a quite frequent mistake. Tagging should be done in accordance with Danbooru's own definitions, not those of the artist or some other site. The whole point of having definitions is to ensure that each tag has a consistent meaning. Most tags are defined in terms of the content of the image itself, not what people have been saying about it or any other contextual information. There are exceptions, like siblings, but the general principle is to "tag what you see, not what you know". This is stated in howto:tag, and you've been here as long as I have, so I'm a little surprised that this is news to you.

Didn't Luke himself say he didn't find Sylphy attractive because her chest was small?

Flopsy said:

That's a quite frequent mistake. Tagging should be done in accordance with Danbooru's own definitions, not those of the artist or some other site. The whole point of having definitions is to ensure that each tag has a consistent meaning. Most tags are defined in terms of the content of the image itself, not what people have been saying about it or any other contextual information. There are exceptions, like siblings, but the general principle is to "tag what you see, not what you know". This is stated in howto:tag, and you've been here as long as I have, so I'm a little surprised that this is news to you.

It's disappointing that you're getting mass downvoted for giving correct advice. We had a similar problem with users mistagging NTR even after being corrected in post #9950953. The wiki is very clear about what counts and what doesn't. The random users that keep adding the tag should pay attention to this line in particular:

Do not apply this tag if only the artist's commentary mentioned that it was NTR-themed posts but other sign of it being such shown in the image itself (such as the "cuckolded" character being absent).

(Actually, that last part is phrased horribly, but it still shouldn't be too hard to understand.)

For tagging purposes, I would classify Pixiv tags added by the artist at about the same level as or lower than artist commentary, as that's basically what it is except it could also be used to intentionally affect visibility since tagging rules aren't as strict there. It is simply not enough on its own to justify tagging it under our rules. Maybe cheating_(relationship) would apply here, but not netorare. If you disagree, please provide some evidence from the post that indicates NTR without using the artist tags, commentary, or canon lore.

DakTheMan said in comment #2553394:

Didn't Luke himself say he didn't find Sylphy attractive because her chest was small?

yeah but the artist doesn't watch MT