Posted under General
jay19 said:
about post #5811848
The artist, themselves, consider the kid to be shota. Hence the tag
https://twitter.com/Drasdr7513/status/1585646317560164354?s=20&t=ARKJfIFNCneTVfUrsjYeXg
Would that really matter? I'm not familiar with shota, but what's considered a loli in danbooru seems pretty strict to me (to the point of making some loli to not count as one here)
ziin1234 said:
Would that really matter? I'm not familiar with shota, but what's considered a loli in danbooru seems pretty strict to me (to the point of making some loli to not count as one here)
Well you’re right about that. Danbooru does have a strict loli definition.
But when I put it up, I knew the artist thought of the guy as a kid and he even calls her big sis (onee San) earlier in the comic.
And even if he appears tall, he’s still shorter the girl he’s with.
Keeping those factors in mind, “shota” tag seems about right.
If someone else here thinks differently they are free to change it. I guess.
I've always considered shota to be something like:
1. Small
2. (Massive) Age difference, E.g. early teenage son and mother
Though I don't tag the 2nd one as much as I probably should...
post #5859254 for example. Maybe it should?
Updated
Jigsy said:
I've always considered shota to be something like:
1. Small
2. (Massive) Age difference, E.g. early teenage son and motherThough I don't tag the 2nd one as much as I probably should...
post #5859254 for example. Maybe it should?
We dont count age difference for shota or loli. That looks like a teen.
Would post #206705 count as S loli?
Check post #5233129 and posts after it in that pool.
post #758970 and parent of post #924589, which are used as examples as the "non-loli" in loli] wiki despite needing gold account to see it.
Edit: Request check for children of post #3249233. I can't see it, but since Pixiv only has one image of that character, it's probably just the same image
Updated
Not quite sure here, tagged the latter to be safe for now.
post #5667041
Not a loli. The character is older than usual, medium breasts, waist-hip ratio.
TenaciousTurtleDucks said:
Yes on post #3355111 and post #4713143. post #4551832 is to poor anatomy to judge.
Unbreakable said:
I would say yes.
Tagged as loli but those are some big thighs and wide hips.
post #5935836, post #5935835, post #5935830 and post #5935829, they look rather loli to me, but i might be mistaken
Updated
KagayakuShiningGate said:
post #11548 and post #11547?
Looks older than our definition of loli.
smowtenshi said:
post #5935836, post #5935835, post #5935830 and post #5935829, they look rather loli to me, but i might be mistaken
I concur.
Unbreakable said:
Just petite I think.
