worldendDominator said:
Leaning towards yes.
Posted under General
worldendDominator said:
Leaning towards yes.
Is this Shota?
post #5611114
post #5611040
This can’t be considered loli, can it? It’s a smug looking kid with summer clothes.
Drimacus said:
Is this Shota?
post #5611114
It's either a femboy or a futa?
Looks loli to me.
post #4840607
should this be loli/child? Also should this be questionable instead of sensitive?
post #4503980
nothing here says "loli"
Omo_Fan said:
post #4840607
should this be loli/child? Also should this be questionable instead of sensitive?
looks more petite to me. Also sensitive looks good enough.
TenaciousTurtleDucks said:
oh yeah that artist that likes the cats. Yes, it's shota!
indexador2 said:
Probably should be flagged
post #5420192
Only rating:sensitive, thus not loli.
Vasi1 said:
post #5420192
Only rating:sensitive, thus not loli.
Can we remove loli from the post #2491767?
Oniii-chan said:
Can we remove loli from the post #2491767?
No
Ars said:
As we all know, making sure an image is correctly tagged as loli or not is rather important, though it can be rather dubious at best. I'm starting this thread in hopes of getting a centralized point of checking.
If you're unsure whether or not a certain image or set of images warrants the loli tag, post it here (in "post #******" format, without the qoutes) and hopefully someone more knowledgeable will clear it up.
Let me start it off with post #594502 and post #584872
[mod edit: updated thread title to include shota - jxh2154]
post #5662179
Does this count? It's not explicit or anything, but it's still obvious foot fetishism involving a child character
Some of my own posts - that aren't even shota, just otoko no ko - are being tagged shota.
Funny thing is, I can't even see shota posts on this account. So this feels kinda unfair. Can someone fix this somehow?