Posted under General
kittey said:
“Tween” is 20+ and “child” is more like “looks below 12”?
Yeah, no (not to you).
If I understand this correctly then the suggestion to make the loli definition more ambiguous. That's not acceptable.
If someone wants to look at such images then there is also a petite tag, although it's not a tag that describes the character's "age" (unlike the loli tag).
post #3697775 - Uploader insists on it being loli.
kittey said:
post #3697775 - Uploader insists on it being loli.
It's rated safe at the moment so no loli tag unless it gets re-rated.
Unbreakable said:
Loli.
Blue_Trident said:
Gotta say no on this one. Though perspective and style makes it hard to discern.
post #3712711 - Currently rated safe. Two other users think it should be loli (and thus questionable).
kittey said:
post #3712711 - Currently rated safe. Two other users think it should be loli (and thus questionable).
Not only is it not loli, I don't think it should even be tagged child.
Also, it's worth mentioning that one of the users you mentioned has already been banned for sockpuppeting, and the other is a brand new account that likely belongs to the same person.
kittey said:
post #3712711 - Currently rated safe. Two other users think it should be loli (and thus questionable).
I agree with iridescent slime, should neither be tagged loli nor child imo.
Seems like user #723179 was adding these tags to a few posts yesterday but got a little carried away. Most of the edits seem pretty solid to me, but post #3150766 obviously shouldn't be loli, and tagging post #1744038 as shota is just bizarre (both the characters are female), and then there are a bunch of images that I'm not sure about. Any loli/shota experts want to double-check these posts and see if any edits need to be reverted?
iridescent_slime said:
Seems like user #723179 was adding these tags to a few posts yesterday but got a little carried away. Most of the edits seem pretty solid to me, but post #3150766 obviously shouldn't be loli, and tagging post #1744038 as shota is just bizarre (both the characters are female), and then there are a bunch of images that I'm not sure about. Any loli/shota experts want to double-check these posts and see if any edits need to be reverted?
Dont think we have a shota expert. Anyway it would be good if anyone who does check through such a list replies here when theyr done so others dont have to (yes I know Im three days late).
alsv_ said:
No question.
Loli it is.
post #3144812 originally had the loli tag and was later removed.
