Unbreakable said:
Doesn't look loli to me.
The perspective makes it a bit hard to judge, but I guess not?
Posted under General
Unbreakable said:
Doesn't look loli to me.
The perspective makes it a bit hard to judge, but I guess not?
post #83715
Safe or loli?
Il ad post #83708 post #83717 and post #83720.
They should either be safe or loli.
post #3567144
Looking at some of the other images here, I'd guess this shouldn't be tagged loli.
I tagged the parent but not sure if this should also get the tag, I added it for now to be on the safe side.
ion288 said:
post #99690
Sexualy suggestive? Really?
Blushing while sensually licking ice cream… yeah, pretty much. Considering the Boku no Pico description, that’s definitely intended to be suggestive.
ion288 said:
post #99690
Sexualy suggestive? Really?
Without any context, tonguing an ice cream cone like that looks extremely suggestive. Posts like this are the reason that tag exists.
post #2905960. This one feels rather loli to me even though nothing is shown beyond condoms.
post #109213 Child and Q. Does this one have a cameltoe? If so it should be loli.
post #108888 and post #107097: Safe or loli?
ion288 said:
post #108888: Safe or loli?
Just airing your crotch with nothing questionable shown should be safe.
Did you get the ID wrong and meant post #111088? Skirt lift on the bed as a valentine gift seems rather questionable to me.
Edit, since nobody else replied:
post #2905960. This one feels rather loli to me even though nothing is shown beyond condoms.
Seems loli to me too. That’s overtly sexual.
post #109213 Child and Q. Does this one have a cameltoe? If so it should be loli.
I’d say it’s cameltoe+loli, but I guess many other users would consider it safe by today’s standards?
Can’t help you with post #107097.
Updated
post #3482681 & child post #3482682
Currently tagged as loli, but looks too developed in my eyes.
alsv_ said:
post #3482681 & child post #3482682
Currently tagged as loli, but looks too developed in my eyes.
I'd probably tag it as petite instead.
ion288 said:
Safe and not loli imo (going by howto:rate)
post #3650450 seems to only be tagged loli because of the pixiv tag.
post #125505? Looks safe and older to me.
post #829205 and post #1352332 likewise seems to old for the loli tag.
On the other side post #1513561, post #453359 and possibly post #982512 feels like they should be loli.
Any thoughts?
This post is not a loli according to the standards of Danbooru. The artist and I specifically used this example ( post #3514528 ) as reference to explicitly draw Grecale with a more mature physique than one that would warrant a loli tag. If our Grecale is loli, then obviously the excuse of "draw more mature" with arciealbano's Ishigaki does not hold up at all.
SumeragiAkeiko said:
This post is not a loli according to the standards of Danbooru. The artist and I specifically used this example ( post #3514528 ) as reference to explicitly draw Grecale with a more mature physique than one that would warrant a loli tag. If our Grecale is loli, then obviously the excuse of "draw more mature" with arciealbano's Ishigaki does not hold up at all.
While I would agree with you, her head proportions make her look like a loli. I'm not sure if this even falls under petite. I would like to ask for confirmation though.
Mysterious_Uploader said:
While I would agree with you, her head proportions make her look like a loli. I'm not sure if this even falls under petite. I would like to ask for confirmation though.
Pretty sure at least three of the examples for adolescent ( post #1968484, post #349864, post #2579928) have the same head-body proportions, especially when considering the post and PoV.