Loli/shota check thread.

Thank you for clarifying, albert. It really sucks that something innocent in intent and presentation can be seen as obscene enough that it needs to be hidden from casual viewership, though. To my mind, if it's as harmless as the old Coppertone sunblock ads (the ones with the dog tugging on the young girl's bathing suit, baring her backside), it ought not to be considered non-worksafe. But if the ad company has to be pleased in such a way, so be it.
Perhaps I should open an email dialogue on the subject with Peter Payne; he has been communicative and willing to discuss matters of various kinds in the past.

(For the record, I didn't think post #617420 was loli. Dunno where you got the idea that I would, S1eth.)

You tagged various other images of Momiji by the same artist with a similar figure loli a year ago.

Not all of them, though, and not even all the ones wherein she isn't given large breasts. tera zip uses some odd mixture of post- and pre-pubescent features on his various Momiji pics, so I have to go image by image and decide each according to how it is depicted (as is my usual habit).

The above post #617420, her torso versus her head size does not at all give me the impression of loli. On the other hand, post #586697 and its child show her having a torso with almost no B/W/H variation, proportions overall short when compared against the head size, and no post-pubescent features to speak of that can't be automatically assumed to be baby fat. I object to the removal of the loli tag from those two. post #606205 as well, for that matter.
(You'll notice I did waver a bit on post #612353, since that torso length is not in agreement with the hips and slight bust as depicted.)

post #1031249
Small breasts, big head compared to the body and, from what I can tell, kiddy-short legs and arms. Loli (?) because of sexy clothing.

She does have breasts beyond mere baby fat, but I can't help but think it's a cop-out, since the rest of her is loli. I say loli, but I would like other opinions.

Hillside_Moose said:
She does have breasts beyond mere baby fat,

I actually think the artist was attempting to give the impression that the cut-outs in her top were squishing them outwards, so to me, that means they could very well be mere baby fat.

Whether that is the case or not, I agree that she looks very much loli otherwise, so I tagged it.

post #890748

Loli.

post #1053657

Most likely

post #1053832
I was pretty sure about that one but Hazuki just removed the tag.

post #1053610

post #1054260
Pretty sure it is since Sakura is supposed to be a little girl at this point, but just wanted to doublecheck.

post #1053657
Yes.

post #1053832
Long torso suggests petite, not loli.

post #1053610
Not much there to work with, but the noticeable breasts suggests not loli.

post #1054260
Legs are unusually long, but the short torso makes it loli, I think.

post #1053610: Definitely loli with that face.

post #1036356

Looks very loli to me.

JackyHF said:
post #1036356
Looks very loli to me.

Agreed. Tagged, and bumped up to rating:e due to non-innocent bodily fluids.

Moriya family & friends dump. I picked up a lot of candidates from running through Sanae, Kanako, & Suwako's tags over the last two weeks, so I'll be putting them out in smaller batches over the next few days.

post #327666
post #556086 Suwako
post #604196 for Kogasa, especially compared to Sanae in size.
post #613097 Suwako. Probably not.
post #618619 Cirno
post #620825 Is Suwako child, loli, or neither?
post #631996 Suwako
post #723372, 723374 Suwako
post #764959, 764960, 764961 chibi, loli, both?

post #786332 Three Mischievous Faeries
post #865745, 865746, 865747 Long legs but torso is only 2x head.
post #871226 Remilia
post #885481 Suwako
post #957899, 962658 Suwako
post #995045 Flan
post #1010326 Tenshi. Huge head, tiny torso, and kid's backpack play.
post #1044020 The usual suspects: Flan, Remi, Suika, Kisume, etc.

post #327666 - loli
post #556086 - Fairly tame lingerie, no exposure.
post #604196 - Considering the apparent size of Kogasa's head, that looks to be either a screwup in proportion, perspective, or both.
post #613097 - Not loli.
post #618619 - The artist seems to have gotten lazy, drawn only one torso, stitched a pair of tits on one, and went from there. Either way, I think Cirno does qualify in this one.
post #620825 - I'm going to go out on a limb and say child, here, considering there is zero exposure of any sensitive bits.
post #631996 - I'm inclined to call it child, but not sure.
post #723372, post #723374 - tagged
post #764959, post #764960, post #764961 - Just chibi. You can make out the flare of her hips despite the perspective-distortion.

post #786332 - I don't like tagging loli on 4koma, but in this case it's appropriate.
post #865745, post #865746, post #865747 - doesn't look loli to me.
post #871226 - can't get a proper grasp of her figure from what's visible
post #885481 - looks more like she's just small, rather than loli
post #957899, post #962658 - distinctly un-loli face
post #995045 - loli Flan, yes. But I'm leaning towards flagging this one for nude filtering Alphes sprites.
post #1010326 - Usami Renko, actually, but still loli.
post #1044020 - loli, also possibly a nude filter.

post #1044020: I checked them when they were uploaded and he actually drew all of them himself. You can download the psd files (with all layers) of the images from his pixiv.

post #764959 very much loli. Even hips won't change the head/body ratio.