@sgcdonmai: Did you read the discussion on page 27 (it also included children bathing nude)? To me, it looks like it's repeating itself.
Posted under General
@sgcdonmai: Did you read the discussion on page 27 (it also included children bathing nude)? To me, it looks like it's repeating itself.
Not explicit enough?
picnic said:
post #1021428Not explicit enough?
Looks like a case of petite to me.
S1eth said:
@sgcdonmai: Did you read the discussion on page 27 (it also included children bathing nude)? To me, it looks like it's repeating itself.
Yes, and Moose had gone and altered ratings and tagged loli against consensus. Reverted.
all of gin'you_haru's work. not sure if some should be tagged as loli or not
mainly
post #1024253
post #857766
gin'you_haru komeiji_satori
also noticed post #934641 and post #935244 are tagged loli. just wanna double check these too.
Updated by Zekana
Same character with similar proportions but post #901239 has the loli tag and post #919220 does not.
post #901239
has lower eyes and a bigger forehead, which is how children are drawn. Her legs are overall smaller and she has a round belly.
To me, it looks OK the way it is tagged now.
Obviously age appropriate to be lolitagged, but is it explicit enough?
Uh, post #1028162 is not even questionable. Loli tag wiki explicitly says that it should only be used for "sexually explicit or suggestive (not safe for work) art works of girls who appear to be preadolescent". And character being topless or even nude does not automatically make the image sexually suggestive.
Post #903633
Loli? She looks like a near-adult teen but I still ask.
I removed loli from post #17656 since it seems totally non sexual to me.
post #1033822
The girl on the right looks small, so I'm not sure.
post #53572: loli or just petite?
post #1033822: I dunno, something about the torso and leg length is giving me conflicting signals, but I would tag it loli just in case.
post #53572: Not loli at all.