Confetto said:
added flat_chest, not lewd enough for loli
Posted under General
Confetto said:
added flat_chest, not lewd enough for loli
Vanniaa067 said:
In case of both...
post #9149738
post #9111753
added
santander said:
1 and 2 definitely.
c_spl said:
Definitely no.
post #8813682
Diluc seems too big to count as shota imo. Does anyone agree?
Blank_User said:
post #8813682
Diluc seems too big to count as shota imo. Does anyone agree?
Looks too old for me.
Ars said:
As we all know, making sure an image is correctly tagged as loli or not is rather important, though it can be rather dubious at best. I'm starting this thread in hopes of getting a centralized point of checking.
If you're unsure whether or not a certain image or set of images warrants the loli tag, post it here (in "post #******" format, without the qoutes) and hopefully someone more knowledgeable will clear it up.
Let me start it off with post #594502 and post #584872
[mod edit: updated thread title to include shota - jxh2154]
Loli
bussinessinformatics said:
nah
impotent said:
kinda curvy, so maybe not.