FWP said:
Currently tagged as Loli, but dunno if it might just be flat-chested.
small_breasts, not flat_chest, not loli
Posted under General
FWP said:
Currently tagged as Loli, but dunno if it might just be flat-chested.
small_breasts, not flat_chest, not loli
post #9188893 (also the related nude variants)
Looks shota to me
post #9182978
post #9183013 (and maybe shota?)
post #9183160
Updated by TheAnonyUser
post #8588089 doesn't seem like loli to me. Can anyone check for second opinion?
Missingno2024 said:
Just a normal swimsuit, not too revealing
post #9197265 and child post for consistency
post #9206598 decided first two arent loli, tagged the rest loli. Second opinion pls.
post #9211396
Troll upload of the infamous Nevermind album cover from Nirvana. I increased the rating to E and tagged it with shota and toddlercon for now just to be safe, but I'm bringing it up here in case that's too extreme.
Keep in mind though that this album cover has a real baby on it, so I think being more strict is warranted.
Hereinafter said:
The Nevermind cover is not "toddlercon" and off-topic spam is not worth gardening in the first place, you're just validating the spammer.
We don't care who the uploader is, the uploader doesn't care if their posts get proper tags or not, and the basic tagging requirements don't change based on whether it's spam or not. And while you can make an argument that we don't need to waste our energy making sure all those posts are thoroughly tagged (which I would agree with), we still at the very least need to make sure they're rated properly and have the tags that are likely to appear on blacklists. If we really want to discourage spammers, we should permanently delete the bottom-of-the-barrel posts. They will feel victorious by the fact their shitposts are a permanent part of the site regardless of what tags they get.
Fortunately, this post was banned (since it's a real photo of someone under 18). Hopefully, it will get permanently deleted at some point.
Blank_User said:
Fortunately, this post was banned (since it's a real photo of someone under 18). Hopefully, it will get permanently deleted at some point.
Since it's banned I guess it doesn't matter, but for future tagging (?) it's an 18+ hidden by default cover on Rateyourmusic but not removed entirely like Virgin Killer.
We tag parodies like post #1714189 with loli so I don't think you mistagged it even if it's so well known it feels odd.
santander said:
added x2